PLUG, PROTECTIVE, DUST AND MOISTURE SEAL

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC, with CAGE code 75Q65, a contract for the supply of protective dust and moisture seals under solicitation SPE7L1-26-T-868Z, with an award date of July 30, 2026, and a total contract value of $893.55. The item, identified by NSN 5340012606009, is delivered in three contract line items totaling 345 units, with a required delivery date of November 12, 2026, and an original need ship date of November 10, 2027, under a 67-day delivery period. Performance occurs at the DLA New Cumberland Facility in Pennsylvania, with FOB origin terms applying, and inspection and acceptance occur at the destination. The contract includes mandatory compliance with MIL-STD-2073-1E for packaging and MIL-STD-129 for marking, requiring weatherproof packaging for overseas shipments, palletization per RP001, and proper application of DoD-standard labels including NSN and CLIN information. The contract type is fixed-price, and payment must be submitted electronically through Wide Area WorkFlow, with no alternative methods authorized. The contractor is subject to multiple DFARS and FAR clauses governing employment practices, trafficking in persons, employment eligibility verification, sustainable products, hazardous material identification, cybersecurity compliance as per NIST SP 800-171, export controls, and the use of U.S.-flag vessels for ocean transport. The clause 252.240-7997 imposes direct obligations for implementing cybersecurity safeguards for Controlled Unclassified Information, requiring a formal DoD assessment. The contractor must also comply with prohibitions on hexavalent chromium, storage of toxic materials, and procurement from Communist Chinese military companies. All hazardous materials require pre-award submission of Safety Data Sheets and hazard labels under DFARS 252.223-7001 and FAR 52.223-3. The contract includes clauses requiring verification of small business status, electronic submission of payment requests, and the prevention of unauthorized obligations. No evaluation factors, pricing details beyond quantities, or attachment listings are provided, and the technical performance specification is not defined beyond the item description. The contracting officer’s representative and administrative details are not explicitly named, with coordination