PRIMER, ADHESIVE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE8ES24D0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC (CAGE 79343) for one quart of PRIMER, ADHESIVE (NSN 8040016212131) at a total price of $142.91, with an award date of July 17, 2026, and a required delivery date of August 7, 2026. The contract is a single-line-item, fixed-price delivery order issued under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity vehicle, with the item to be shipped FOB destination, meaning the contractor bears all transportation costs and risks until delivery. The delivery is directed to Fort Campbell, KY, at a specific building and door location, with strict shipping instructions requiring traceable transportation and explicitly prohibiting parcel post. All packages and documentation must be marked with the Transportation Control Number W50YER61980017, Required Delivery Date 213, and Project Code TP 3 to ensure full traceability. The contract incorporates terms and conditions from the base contract SPE8EG-19-D-0103 and is designated as a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System, reflecting its priority status within DoD logistics. Inspection and acceptance occur at the destination by the government, with no technical specifications or inspection standards provided beyond conformance to contract requirements. Payments will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, OH, using the accounting code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189, and invoicing is expected to follow standard DoD electronic systems such as WAWF. The contractor is certified as a small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business, triggering compliance obligations under relevant FAR sections for socioeconomic programs. No specific packaging, preservation, labeling standards, barcoding requirements, or MIL-STDs are cited. The contracting officer is Nate Prattico of DLA Troop Support in Philadelphia, with no designated COR/COTR assigned. The basis of award is presumed to be lowest price technically acceptable due to the minimal value, lack of non-price factors in the documentation, and absence of a detailed evaluation section.