PRIMER, ADHESIVE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE8ES-24-D-0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC, with CAGE code 79343, for the delivery of one pint of PRIMER, ADHESIVE (NSN 8040014509187) at a fixed unit price of $94.30, bringing the total contract value to $94.30. The order, issued as SPE8ES-26-F-72GX and posted on DIBBS on July 31, 2026, requires delivery to Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, by August 10, 2026, under FOB destination terms, meaning the contractor bears all costs and risks until the item is received at the destination. The item is designated as a rated order under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS), ensuring its priority status within federal supply chains. The awardee is certified as a Small Disadvantaged Business and Women-Owned Small Business, triggering compliance with FAR clauses related to these socioeconomic designations, though no standard FAR or DFARS contract clauses are explicitly listed in the order documentation, indicating that terms are referenced from the underlying basic IDIQ contract. Packaging and marking instructions require all shipments to use traceable means—excluding parcel post—and must clearly display the basic contract number and delivery order number; however, no specific military packaging standards like MIL-STD are cited, and no preservation or labeling details beyond the identification numbers are defined. Inspection and acceptance occur at the destination by the government, with no explicit technical specifications or quality assurance criteria provided. Payment is handled by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using an accounting identifier of BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189, and invoicing is expected through electronic means, though the system is not specified. The contracting officer’s representative is not identified, but the local administrator, Nate Prattico, serves as the point of contact for administrative matters. The procurement was issued as a delivery order under a broader contract vehicle, and the absence of solicitation terms, evaluation factors, or detailed clauses suggests this transaction is an administrative execution of an existing framework agreement with minimal new substantive requirements.