PRODUCTION LOT TESTING (GOVERNMENT)

The contract SPE4A625PY986 was awarded to GLOBAL LOGISTICS STRATEGIES INC. with CAGE code 7BUL6 by the Defense Logistics Agency under the Department of Defense, with the award issued on July 20, 2026. The scope of work involved two line items: Production Lot Testing (Government) identified by NSN 0001S00000061 and a Cable Assembly, Spec identified by NSN 6150-01-347-7836. Both line items were subsequently canceled via modification P00002 due to the vendor’s inability to deliver, resulting in zero quantities contracted and no extended pricing. The contractor’s place of performance is located at 6021 Silver King Blvd, Cape Coral, FL 33914-8075. Although the original contract value is referenced as being in the Award Doc, no definitive total price is available in the provided documentation, and no option quantities or maximum limits were disclosed. Administration of the contract falls under DLA Aviation in Richmond, VA, with DCMA Southeast in Orlando, FL serving as the administering office. The contracting officer is Anthony Gray, with Carolyn Archer as the administrative contact. No payment details, invoicing method, or remittance information are specified. Compliance with Department of Defense standards is implied, particularly for packaging and marking, consistent with use of National Stock Numbers and DLA contracting practices, though no explicit MIL-STDs such as MIL-STD-129 or MIL-STD-2073 are cited in the provided materials. Government inspection and acceptance are the responsibility of the contracting authority, with applicable FAR provisions 43.103(b) and 43.203(b) governing modification and acceptance procedures. No detailed specifications, quality standards, or technical requirements beyond NSN and “SPEC” designations are included. While the NAICS code is listed as 541380 for Management Consulting Services, no offeror representations regarding small business status, socioeconomic certifications, or required certifications such as drug-free workplace or subcontracting plans were included in the documentation. The solicitation and contract form did not specify the contract type, nor was Section I contract clauses, Section J attachments, Section M evaluation factors, or Section H special requirements provided in the available data. The absence of these sections and the cancellation of all deliverables indicate a contract that was