PRODUCTION LOT TESTING (GOVERNMENT)

The contract awarded to CONNECTORS PLUS LLC (CAGE 7X0Z6) under solicitation SPE4A6-25-T-183Z and identified by contract number SPE4A625PH677 is a modification-based award issued by the Defense Logistics Agency, specifically DLA Aviation, with a total value of $31,403.64 and an award date of July 15, 2026. The scope centers on corrective actions for a cable assembly (NSN 5995015816244) and government-conducted production lot testing, with the delivery date for the sole CLIN extended to August 14, 2026, from an original date of December 1, 2025. All work must align with specified technical drawing requirements to correct non-conformances, and the modification was executed under FAR 43.203(b), confirming its administrative nature as a correction to existing contract terms rather than a new procurement. The contractor’s performance location is implied to be its facility in Pahrump, NV, while oversight and acceptance authority rests with DLA Aviation in Richmond, VA, and DCMA Mountain Pacific in Lakewood, CO, with Julio Fernandez listed as the contracting officer for administrative coordination. There is no formal listing of standard FAR clauses, evaluation factors, packaging requirements, or special contract provisions in the available documentation; the information provided is limited to the award notice and modification header details. Funding is referenced via purchase request number 7007138472, but no appropriation data, AAC, TAS, or ACRN are specified. The contract does not indicate invoicing methods, payment portals, or electronic submission requirements, and no representations or certifications regarding small business status, socioeconomic designations, or labor compliance are present or verified. Packaging and marking details, including compliance with MIL-STD-2073, are not explicitly stated, though the NSN and CAGE code are included, suggesting their use may be implied. The award notice includes conditional approval of production lot testing and cites a quality notification number, yet no formal attachments, inspection criteria, or quality standards beyond engineering drawings are documented. The contract type remains unstated but is contextually consistent with a firm-fixed-price arrangement given the nature of the deliverables and lack of cost-reimbursable indicators.