PRODUCTION LOT TESTING (GOVERNMENT)

The contract awarded to APEX MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. (CAGE 2V343) under solicitation SPE7L1-25-T-7052 and identified as SPE7L125P4795 is valued at $27,000 and was awarded on July 15, 2026, by the Defense Logistics Agency through a simplified acquisition procedure using unilateral modification authority under FAR 13.302(a) or 12.303(a). The work consists of three primary line items: Production Lot Testing (Government), Government First Article Test, and the delivery of a sear for a bomb rack (NSN 1095001386076). All performance is to occur at the contractor’s facility located at 11686 Tuxford St, Sun Valley, CA 91352-3134, with contract administration handled by DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, OH, and oversight provided by DCMA Southern California. The contracting officer, Michael Finken, serves as the primary point of contact for administrative and payment matters, although no Contracting Officer’s Representative or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative is specified in the documentation. The contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90, addressing DEI discrimination by federal contractors, effective April 2026, which imposes compliance obligations on the contractor regarding equitable practices. No additional special requirements such as security clearances, key personnel designations, options, or organizational conflict of interest provisions are explicitly stated. While the contract references NSN and CAGE codes and standard forms like SF-30, it contains no detailed specifications for packaging, marking, preservation, or barcoding, nor are any military standards such as MIL-STD-129 or MIL-STD-2073-1 referenced. Inspection responsibilities lie with the Government, though the exact location and technical acceptance criteria are not detailed. Payment instructions point to DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, OH, and electronic submissions via DIBBS are required for administrative changes. No evaluation factors, weights, or socioeconomic certifications are documented, and the basis of award remains unspecified, though the low dollar value suggests a possible LPTA approach. The contract lacks explicit delivery timelines, FOB terms, quantities, or pricing breakdowns, with total value provided only as a lump sum.