Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Combined Synopsis/Solicitation opportunity from Department Of Transportation was posted on May 28, 2013. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Project Management Office Support Services

Awarded
SA1301-13-RQ-0003Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541611
New
Business Impact Analysis, Disaster Recovery, and Business Continuity Plan Services (RFP-VC-26-006), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (California)
Solicitation # RFP-VC-26-006
Hagerty Consulting, Inc. is seeking a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) subcontractor to support an engagement with the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) in California. The project focuses on enhancing the agency's operational resilience framework through the development and review of a Business Impact Analysis (BIA), Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP), and Business Continuity Plan (BCP). Key responsibilities include identifying critical time-sensitive functions, quantifying disruption impacts, developing recovery playbooks, and facilitating in-person tabletop exercises to identify response gaps. Preferred expertise includes IT/OT resilience, critical infrastructure, and experience within the water or wastewater utility sectors. The engagement is funded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and requires strict adherence to CISA, NIST, and FEMA standards. The contract has an initial term of three years with an option to extend, with an estimated project value of approximately 1 million dollars per year. Qualified subcontractors must demonstrate a strong record of performance, including at least two similar projects completed within the last five years. Compliance requirements include registration in SAM.gov, adherence to California Prevailing Wage laws, and compliance with Build America, Buy America (BABA) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Proposals must be submitted electronically via PlanetBids by November 17, 2026.
Hagerty Consulting, Inc.

POSTED

about 3 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 19 days
NAICS: 541611
New
SLED
PROVIDE A COMPLIANCE GAP ANALYSIS FOR UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
Solicitation # 27-6275
The University of Hawaii System is soliciting professional consulting services under RFP No. 27-6275 to conduct an enterprise-wide compliance gap analysis, compliance program maturity assessment, and the development of a strategic implementation roadmap. Led by the inaugural Chief Compliance and Ethics Officer, the project aims to establish a baseline of risks and strengths by mapping current practices against the U.S. Department of Justice's Seven Elements of an Effective Compliance Program and USSG §8B2.1, while incorporating higher education leading practices. Key deliverables include a Project Management Plan, a Compliance Inventory and Ownership Map, an Assessment Report, an Operating Model and Strategic Roadmap, and an Executive Summary with briefings, with final deliverables due by May 28, 2027. The contract will be awarded to the responsive and responsible offeror deemed most advantageous to the University, with key personnel scoring 20 points in the evaluation. Qualified firms must have at least ten years of compliance consulting experience and have completed five compliance assessments for higher education institutions. The Project Director must possess CCEP and LPEC certifications and have verifiable experience as a Chief Compliance Officer in higher education. Proposals must be submitted via HIePRO by November 30, 2026, and include a firm fixed price for each deliverable. Strict requirements are in place for data security, including U.S.-based storage and encryption, as well as comprehensive insurance coverage including Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Workers' Compensation.
Department of University of Hawaii

POSTED

about 11 hours ago

DEADLINE

in about 1 month
NAICS: 541611
New
SLED
Management Consulting Services
Solicitation # RFQu-27-0477
The City of Phoenix Finance Central Procurement is soliciting offers under RFQu-27-0477 to establish a Qualified Vendor List for Management Consulting Services. The contract aims to secure vendors for as-needed engagements in change management, organizational studies or mapping, project management review, compliance, management strategies, and process analysis. The agreement will have a five-year term beginning March 1, 2027, or the effective date of final signature and recording, whichever is later, with no options to extend. Awards will be granted to responsive and responsible offerors determined to be most advantageous to the City based on capacity, experience, proposed methodology, and pricing. Selected consultants must provide a rate sheet for fixed or hourly bill rates, as the City will not pay additional charges for overhead, benefits, or local travel. Invoicing is required every other week in arrears, with final payment issued within 60 days of completion. The contract mandates strict adherence to nondiscrimination laws, including Title VI and the DBE-N Program for small business participation, and requires a written heat safety plan for outdoor work. Offerors must submit all proposals electronically via the City's Procurement Portal by November 6, 2026, including mandatory signed certifications regarding debarment, heat safety, and conflicts of interest to avoid disqualification.
Finance Central Procurement

POSTED

about 12 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 23 days
NAICS: 541611
New
SLED
TANF Tribal Collaboration
Solicitation # SRC000483
The North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services, Economic Assistance Section, is soliciting proposals under solicitation SRC000483 for a qualified vendor to facilitate collaboration between the state government and federally recognized tribal nations. The primary objective is to strengthen partnerships and develop culturally responsive strategies for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Key deliverables include facilitating two annual meetings between state TANF administrators and tribal leaders, conducting assessments of outreach and service delivery, integrating TANF Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) and Tribal Native Employment Works (NEW) programs, and creating toolkits and guides for TANF workers. The successful vendor will be required to travel within North Dakota, including to rural and tribal communities, for up to 15 days per year. The contract is intended to run from January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2028, with a total budget not to exceed 100,000 dollars; proposals exceeding this amount will be deemed non-responsive. The state maintains the option to extend the contract by up to 12 months and renew it for up to three additional 24-month periods. Proposals are evaluated on a 100-point scale, with 30 points each allocated to the understanding of the scope of work, the management plan, and experience and qualifications, while the remaining 10 points are based on cost. In the event of a tie, preference is given to resident North Dakota bidders. Proposals must be submitted electronically via the NDBuys portal by November 11, 2026.

POSTED

about 12 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 13 days

General Info

Contract Value

$169,768.81

NAICS

541611 - Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Place of Performance

U.S. Department of Commerce Commerce Acqusition Solutions (CAS) Room 6521 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20230-0001, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Award Issued Date

Documents

2

US Department of Commerce SF1449 - AA-CIO-WC-O-13-00059

PDF, High priority: read this firstrfp
High

Final_Answers.docx

DOCX

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Contract not broken down yet

CLEATUS splits the solicitation into Uniform Contract Format (UCF) sections: scope, pricing, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.

Timeline

3 updates
PhaseAwarded
Posted

Combined Synopsis

Notice updated

Response deadline changed from May 31, 2013 to Jun 6, 2013. The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Get full access to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Transportation → Department Of Commerce Sspo
Contacts1 person available
OfficeWASHINGTON, DC, 20230, USA
Office AddressWASHINGTON, DC, 20230, USA
Contacts
Kirk D. BoykinContracting Officer

Full Description

Show more
Questions and Responses 1. The quantity of hours listed for each labor category under the base year and all option years on pages 3 -8 of the solicitation is 2000. Since the base year is only 3 months long should offers use a pro-rated 500 hours per labor category when developing the pricing for the base year? Response: The Base year will be from July 1, 2013 - March 31, 2014. Therefore use 1286 hours for the Base Year. 2. Should the offeror add in an estimated travel amount per year for pricing purposes or will the government provide an estimated amount? Response: The estimated amount for travel is $300.00/year. 3. Who are the executive sponsors responsible for this PMO solicitation? Response: Simon Szykman, Chief Information Officer (CIO) 4. Is there an incumbent for this effort and is the incumbent able to participate in the solicitation? Response: Yes, there is an incumbent, and the incumbent is free to participate in the solicitation. 5. As this is procurement for a BPA, please advise which, if any positions are considered key, as Key Personnel are typically identified at the task order level. Response: The Project Manager and Business Resource Analyst for the first BPA call are key positions. Each subsequent call will identify key positions. 6. Given the importance of completely avoiding any perceived or actual conflicts of interest, are current IT vendors who perform work at Commerce Headquarters conflicted out of bidding on the solicitation? Response: All vendors must abide by the terms and conditions of their respective contract. However there is no overall prohibition concerning current IT vendors bidding on the solicitation. 7. If the winning bidder performs acquisition related support services for OCIO, would they be conflicted out of subsequent solicitations at the Department of Commerce? Response: CAR 1352.209-71 - Limitation of Future Contracting - Alt II applies. Which states, "(a) (2) The contractor shall participate in the technical evaluation of other contractors' proposals or products. To ensure objectivity, the contractor is precluded from award of any supply or service contract or subcontract for the system or its major components. This restriction shall be effective for the life of the contract. 8. Would the government grant bidders a two week extension? Response: The closing date has been amended to read as June 6, 2013 by 1:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. 9. In the pricing template, 2000 hours are listed for each position for base year and option years. Given the base year is shorter than an option year, can we assume these amounts are for evaluation purposes only. Is this correct? Response: The Base year will be from July 1, 2013 - March 31, 2014. Therefore use 1286 hours for the Base Year. 10. If the hours are for evaluation purposes, is there an estimate of the expected number of task orders and level of effort under this BPA? Response: Not sure at this time. 11. The RFQ states that Offerors email their submissions and then also states the Offer should provide submissions via hard copy and CD. Will the Government confirm that submitting submission via email only is sufficient? Response: Please submit Email copies, four (4) hard copies and a CD ROM. 12. Will the Government confirm that the Subcontracting Plan is outside of page count? Response: The Subcontracting Plan is outside of the page count, the Subcontracting Plan page limit is 10 pages. 13. Will the Government clarify if we are restricted to the 5 labor categories listed in the RFQ? Response: Yes, please use the 5 labor categories listed in the RFQ. 14. There were 5 primary objectives listed on page 14 of the SOW, but it appears that one of them (2) IT approach and technology trends, may be missing from the "Section d. Requirements." Response: There is not a requirement for the objectives of the PMO to be identical to the requirements of this RFQ. 15. Attachment 1, Page 12, Page Limitation: The RFQ reads: "Excluding the cover page, r'sum's and past performance forms and questionnaires, the Technical Proposal (including all non-price factors) is limited to ten (10) pages, single spaced and double sided with at least 11 point font and 1" margins." Q: Would the DOC clarify if the ten (10) pages represent 10 printed pages (5 sheets) or 10 sheets (20 printed pages)? Response: 10 double-sided pages. 16. Attachment 2, Page 23, XIII. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. The RFQ reads: "As specified by individual BPA calls, security clearances may be required. Clearances are issued by the Defense Security Service commensurate with the level of access required, prior to BPA call performance." Does DOC anticipate any clearance requirement at the SECRET or TS level? If so, will DOC sponsor the contractor for a Facility Clearance? Response: No we do not anticipate any clearance requirement at the SECRET or TS levels. 17. SF1449, Schedule of Supplies and Services identifies CLIN 6 (Travel) in each contract period, but does not identify a basis of cost. Q: Will the DOC provide an estimated $ value for Travel for each period? Response: The estimated amount for travel is $300.00/year. 18. SF1449, Schedule of Supplies and Services identifies labor CLINs 1 through 5 in each contract period. Q: Will all five (5) labor categories be funded at contract start? Response: No, all five (5) labor categories will not be funded at contract start. Please see the RFQ correction/clarification - The Project Manager and Business Resource Analyst will be funded at contract start. 19. On an annual basis, approximately how many BPA calls does DOC expect to award? Response: At this point we can only confirm the one BPA call that is included in the RFQ in Attachment 2. 20. What is the average size expected for each BPA call (in budget dollars)? Response: We do not know at this time. 21. The RFQ states a ceiling of $100M over 5 years. This averages $20M annually. Does DOC expect to issue and award BPA calls near this number annually? Response: Please see Amendment 1 for the correction, the ceiling should be $20M total over 5 years. 22. Can DOC provide an expected annual budget associated with this RFQ? Response: Please see Amendment 1 for the correction, the ceiling should be $20M total over 5 years. 23. The RFQ states that the BPA will commence within 2 weeks of the award date. How soon after the award will the first BPA call be issued? Response: The first BPA will be awarded within 2 weeks of the award date. 24. Is there a call associated with the award of the BPA? Response: Yes, the call is Attachment 2 of the RFQ. 25. Should submissions include rates-only associated with the listed labor categories (e.g. Item Numbers x001, x002, x003, x004, x005)? Response: Yes, rates are required only for the listed labor categories. 26. If so, could you confirm that submissions should NOT include a named team? Response: Please provide named team members and resumes for the (1) Project Manager and (2) Business/Resource Analyst only. 27. Will the labor categories in the BPA compose the labor categories for upcoming calls? Response: Each call will include those labor categories required to complete the task. There is not a requirement to use all labor categories. 28. Are resumes listed in the RFQ response expected to be the personnel to support BPA calls? Response: Yes, resumes for the Project Manager and the Business Resource Analyst are expected to be the personnel for the first call. 29. Are any of these positions key? Response: Yes, the Project Manager and Business Resource Analyst for the first BPA call are key positions. Each subsequent call will identify key positions. 30. If so, are we supposed to provide resumes for each of the five positions? Response: No, we do not need resumes for the: Senior Subject Matter Expert, Junior Analyst or Technical Lead for the proposal. 31. Is there a page limit for the resumes? Response: There is a 5 page limitation for employee's resumes. 32. For the resume requirements, the RFQ states that all staff is required to have a Bachelor's degree. Will DOC consider work experience and expertise in the labor category in lieu of a Bachelor's degree? Response: Per the RFQ staff is required to have a Bachelors degree. 33. Page 12 of the RFQ states the following about page limitation: "Excluding the cover page, r'sum's and past performance forms and questionnaires, the Technical Proposal (including all non-price factors) is limited to ten (10) pages, single spaced and double sided with at least 11point font and 1" margins." Does double-sided actually mean the response may be 20 pages? Response: 10 double-sided pages 34. The RFQ Schedule states a Base Year of July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 and identifies a quantity of 2000 hrs for the Project Manager, Analyst, Senior Subject Matter Consultant, Junior Analyst, and Technical Lead labor categories. Please clarify if 2000 hrs is the correct quantity for each labor category given that the base year is only three months. Response: The Base year will be from July 1, 2013 - March 31, 2014. Therefore use 1286 hours for the Base Year. 35. The RFQ Schedule provides one column to enter "Unit Price". Please clarify if offerors can bid two unit prices - on-site and off-site labor rates. Response: No, please provide on-site labor rates. 36. Is there an incumbent for the scope of work detailed in the RFQ? If so, who is it? Response: Yes, the incumbent is Al-Razaq Computing Services. 37. Given the broad scope of services requested in the RFQ, and the potential scale of the vehicle, does the Government anticipates making multiple awards? Response: No the Government does not anticipate making multiple awards. 38. Can the Government provide an estimated annual number of calls and spend under this vehicle? Response: At this point we can only confirm the one BPA call that is included in the RFQ in Attachment 2. 39. Will the usage of the BPA be limited to DOC OCIO or could it be used by other Bureaus within the Department? Response: Yes the BPA can be used by other bureaus within the Department. 40. Will DOC please confirm the period-of-performance for the base year? Response: The Base year will be from July 1, 2013 - March 31, 2014. Therefore use 1286 hours for the Base Year. 41. General. While this vehicle is a new requirement, are there any incumbent contractors performing work for the OCIO? Response: Yes, the incumbent is Al-Razaq Computing Services. 42. Attachment 2 Reports Plans and Meetings. - Are we correct that the listed deliverables apply only upon award of a subsequent BPA call order? Response: The "Reports, Plans and Meetings" deliverables describe the existing deliverables supporting the SOW advertised in solicitation. 43. The SF 1449 indicates an unrestricted solicitation; however page 27 of 55 VI. Contract Clauses includes clause 52.219-27 (Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside). Is this opportunity a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside? Response: Delete the Clause 52.219-27, the RFQ is unrestricted. 44. Is this particular BID open for all the vendors? Can we response to this RFP? Response: Only vendor holding a MOBIS Schedule 874 can submit a quote. 45. If there is an incumbent, what is the level of effort of hours that was provided previously? Response: 2000 hours. 46. Is there a preference for small business? Response: No. 47. Does the government intend to issue multiple awards under the BPA? Response: One award. 48. Page 10 of the RFQ outlines the instructions for submitting the response. The instructions state that responses can be submitted via email, but also state that a CD-ROM should be submitted. Can the government please confirm that email submission is sufficient? Response: The responses shall consist of email submission to contact@example.gov, four (4) hard copies and a CD ROM. 49. Are you considering awards to small businesses? Response: The RFQ is unrestricted. 50. Is the Government referring to the Offeror's Past Performance write up when they mention form? Or is there another form in addition to the Questionnaire that was not provided as an attachment in the solicitation? Response: Yes, use the form provided in the RFQ. See Attachment 4. 51. Will the Government provide a MS Word Version of this form to Offerors? Response: No. 52. The RFQ does not include a sample BPA call. Can DOC provide one prior to the RFQ response deadline? Response: Use Attachment 2 as the sample. 53. If they are hard copies, do you want these want these copies hand-delivered? Response: It is the responsibility of the quoter to deliver the submission by June 6, 2013 by 1:00 p.m. eastern standard time (EST). 54. If hand-delivered, to whom shall they be delivered, where, and by when? Response: Department of Commerce, Herbert C. Hoover Building, Attn: Kirk D. Boykin, Room 6521, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230-0001. 55. Standard Form 1149 Block 10 states that "This Acquisition is Unrestricted" and RFQ Attachment 3 Section VI.a. states "52.219-27 - Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside". Please clarify which competition type is correct. Response: Delete clause 52.219-27. This RFQ is unrestricted. 56. For Technical Quote Section 3, is there a standardized past performance form you want Contractors to fill out to demonstrate relevant past performance? This is separate from the Past Performance Questionnaire provided in Attachment 4. Response: Use Attachment 4 for the past performance form. 57. Attachment 2. Past Performance 3B. Can the government suggest a means to confirm to the reference and the vendor that the government has received the questionnaire response? Response: No, it is the responsibility of each quoter.

More opportunities from Department Of Transportation → Department Of Commerce Sspo

Same awarding agency

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS