SAFETY INDICATOR, FI

The contract award SPE7L726V0742 was issued by the Defense Logistics Agency to SONCOAST PROCUREMENT, LLC, with a total value of $945.50 for the supply of 31 units of SAFETY INDICATOR, FI (NSN 1005015328138), delivered FOB Origin to the DLA Distribution New Cumberland Facility in Pennsylvania. The contract was awarded on July 22, 2026, following solicitation SPE7L7-26-T-4153, and requires delivery within 76 days of order placement, with an original required delivery date of October 1, 2026. Packaging and labeling must fully comply with MIL-STD-129 for marking, barcoding, and shipment identification, ASTM D3951 for general packaging, and DLA RP001 for palletization, with hazardous material labels conforming to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard and requiring pre-award submission of label samples. The contract incorporates a broad array of Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses including cybersecurity protections under 252.204-7012 and 52.240-93, NIST SP 800-171 compliance under 252.240-7997 with deviation 2026-O0025, and subcontracting requirements under 52.244-6, all subject to deviations under 2026-00038 and other referenced codes. Payment is to be processed exclusively through Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF) using an Invoice/Receiving Report for this fixed-price line item, with no alternative invoicing methods accepted. The contracting officer is Charles Duncan, serving as the primary point of contact, while no contracting officer’s representative is named. The awardee is required to affirm its small business status and provide UEI and CAGE information as mandated by FAR provisions, and the contract includes clauses on whistleblower protections, cyber incident reporting, prohibitions on covered telecommunications equipment, and limitations on unauthorized obligations. Inspection and acceptance occur at the destination facility by government personnel, with no cost or unit price disclosed in the line item data despite historical pricing references. No contract options, key personnel requirements, security clearance mandates, or organizational conflict of interest clauses are specified, and the evaluation basis remains unspecified though context suggests a price-driven,