SEALING COMPOUND

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE8ES-24-D-0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC (CAGE 79343), a certified Small Disadvantaged Women-Owned Business, for the delivery of one case of SEALING COMPOUND (NSN 8030003126128) at a total price of $18.51. The order, issued as SPE8ES26F62FA, was awarded on July 15, 2026, with a required delivery date of August 5, 2026, to Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma. Performance is governed by FOB destination terms, meaning the contractor assumes all transportation costs and risks until the item is delivered and accepted at the destination. Shipment must be made via traceable freight methods; parcel post is explicitly prohibited. The contractor is required to mark all packages and documentation with both the basic contract number (SPE8ES-24-D-0005) and the delivery order number (SPE8ES-26-F-62FA), with no barcoding or military packaging standards (e.g., MIL-STD-129) mandated. Inspection and acceptance occur at the delivery point, with government representatives responsible for confirming conformance to contract requirements. The order is classified as a rated priority action under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) per 15 CFR 700, requiring priority processing over non-rated contracts. Payment will be processed electronically through the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using EDI with voucher number 30. The contracting officer, Nate Prattico of DLA Troop Support Construction & Equipment, serves as the sole point of contact with no designated COR or COTR. The contractor’s socioeconomic certifications as a Small Disadvantaged Women-Owned Business trigger compliance obligations under FAR 19.7, including potential subcontracting plan requirements and ongoing verification in SAM and FPDS. The basic contract appears to be an IDIQ vehicle, though this order contains a single line item with no options, extended periods, or additional CLINs. No packaging, preservation, or inspection specifications beyond conformance to the contract were imposed, and no formal attachments or clauses were included beyond administrative identifiers and form-level selections indicating business size and delivery type.