SHIM

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded contract SPRPA125P0624 to RHIMCO INDUSTRIES, INC. (CAGE 57094) on July 20, 2026, for the procurement of a shim identified by NSN 5365-01-045-6536 under simplified acquisition procedures governed by FAR Part 13. The original line item specified 142 units at a unit price of $5.95, for a total extended price of $844.90, but this CLIN was subsequently canceled via modification P00001 effective January 22, 2025, reducing the quantity and value to zero. The contracting officer, Lawrence Zambrano of DLA Aviation, executed the modification citing FAR 13.302-4(b) and FAR 43.203(b) as authority, indicating an administrative adjustment rather than a substantive change in scope. The contract is administered by DLA Aviation’s procurement operations in Philadelphia, PA, with administrative coordination handled by Kaelyn Brown, who can be contacted at KAELYN.BROWN.CTR@DLA.MIL. No other CLINs, options, or pricing details are present in the record, and the total contract value is not disclosed in the award notice despite being referenced. The awardee’s SAM.gov profile, referenced in attachment ATTACH_SAM_57094.pdf, is the only documented supporting file, likely containing UEI, size status, and socioeconomic certifications, though access to its contents is restricted. Packaging and marking requirements are not detailed in the contract text but are expected to comply with standard DLA practices including MIL-STD-129 and MIL-STD-2073, as inferred from the NSN and federal supply context. Inspection and acceptance are the Government’s responsibility, occurring at the receipt point, with no specific technical specifications or quality criteria provided. FOB terms, delivery location, payment methods, and accounting data such as TAS or ACRN are absent, though electronic invoicing via WAWF is presumed typical for DLA. The evaluation factors, contract type, and special requirements like security clearances or OCI clauses are not documented in the available materials, leaving the technical and administrative framework incomplete. No signature dates are filled on the SF-30, and the place of performance field remains blank, suggesting limited detail in the award