SILICONE COMPOUND

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under the basic contract SPE4AX-16-D-9012 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, identified by CAGE code 79343, for the procurement of 500 units of silicone compound (NSN 6850001775094) at a unit price of $2.20, resulting in a total contract value of $1,100.00. The award date is July 18, 2026, with full delivery required by September 16, 2026. The contract is structured as a single-line-item delivery order under an IDIQ vehicle, with no options or additional line items. Performance is designated as FOB origin, meaning title and risk transfer to the government at the point of shipment. The final delivery is for the Government of Israel Ministry of Defense, routed through a third-party logistics provider, GOI MOD G&B PACKING COMPANY, in Jersey City, New Jersey. The contract includes specific marking and labeling requirements, mandating inclusion of the basic contract number, delivery order number, transaction control number, and data identification code on all packages and documentation. The awardee is certified as a small, disadvantaged, women-owned business, triggering compliance obligations under federal small business programs and the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS), which imposes priority performance requirements. Invoicing must adhere to DFARS 252.232-7003, with payments processed electronically through the Wide Area Workflow system by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio. Inspection and acceptance occur at the point of origin, with final confirmation required by an authorized government representative via DD Form 1155. While the contract does not specify detailed packaging, preservation, or quality standards beyond compliance with the contract, it relies on standard DoD logistics procedures and references to the basic contract for additional terms. Oversight is managed by DLA Aviation, with Amanda Parker designated as the government point of contact and Holly Dunavant serving as the local administrator. No formal FAR/DFARS clauses are listed in the delivery order document itself; standard clauses are presumed to be incorporated by reference from the underlying contract. There are no solicitation-related evaluation factors documented, indicating the award likely followed a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology given the low dollar value and absence of technical scoring criteria.