SOCOM Wide Mission Support (SWMS) Group C

Update 11 September 2014: Attached to this announcement is Amendment 0006 which revises Section M Paragraph M1.6.2 to reflect the correct Section L Table reference. There are no other changes as a result of this amendment and no change in the due date or time. Update 09 September 2014: Attached to this announcement is Amendment 0005 and Attachment 1 Revision 2. Update 08 September 2014: Attached to this announcement are Q&As, Amendment 0004, and a revised Attachment 3 (Pricing Template). The due date and time has been extended. Update 05 September 2014: Attached to this announcement are Q&As, Amendment 0003, and a revised Attachment 3 (Pricing Template). Clarification Regarding Past Performance: The Government does will not evaluate personal references as part of the past performance evaluation. Clarification Regarding Attachment 3 Revision 2: The revision released with Amendment 0002 inadvertently included erroneous rates on Tab 2 used to check formulas; offerors should use their own company indirect rates. Update 04 September 2014: Attached to this announcement are final Q&As, Amendment 0002, and a revised Attachment 3 (Pricing Template). Below is a summary of the changes; however, carefully read through the amendment for ALL applicable changes. The due date and time remains unchanged. --H.4 Cost Plus Fixed Fee-Level of Effort (CPFF-LOE) has been revised. --Revise Section L and M (change bars are included in the left margain). Please note the proposal submission method has been revised (See L1.4 for submission requirements). --SORDAC Support Task Order. The anticipated start date of Subtask 2 revised to 20 Jul 2015. --J8S Task Order. The Government has decided that the current J8S SOW does not accurately reflect the requirements of the customer under SWMS. Therefore, Amendment 0002 removes the J8S SOW from the Group C RFP. Update 28 August 2014: Attached to this announcement are Q&A's 157-165. Update 25 August 2014: Attached to this announcement is RFP Amendment 0001 and associated attachment revisions. Also included are Q&A's 80-156. Update 22 August 2014: Please be advised that Amendment 01 is pending and expected to be posted to FBO on Monday 25 August. The amendment will include an extension to the proposal due date and time. Update 14 August 2014: Questions and Answers Attached to this announcement are Questions and Answers 57-79 and clarification on 2 questions posted on 11 August 2014. Please be advised that the Task Orders (TO) released with the Final RFP are actual TO's to be awarded and performed under SWMS, these ARE NOT sample TO's. An RFP Amendment will be issued on or around 18 August to incorporate the changes reflected in the Q&A's, to include changes to the pricing template. Once the template has been revised, companies requesting a template to accommodate more than 5 subcontractors will be provided the revised template. UPDATE 11 AUGUST 2014: Questions and Answers Companies will not receive individual responses to RFP questions. Responses will be posted to FBO. Questions may be paraphrased or consolidated. Attached to this announcement are Questions and Answers #1-56. A Group C RFP Amendment will be issued 12 August 2014 to incorporate changes referenced in the attached. UPDATE 30 JULY 2014: FINAL RFP SWMS GROUP C (H92222-14-R-0019) This is a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) for the SOCOM Wide Mission Support Group C Contract. The sole point of contact for information regarding this acquisition is the Contracting Officer. All inquiries must be emailed and submitted to the Contracting Officer no later than 15 Aug 2014. Please note oral requests (e.g. phone call) for information will be re-directed to provide email correspondence, for documentation purposes. Communications with anyone other than the Contracting Officer are prohibited. Government ethics regulations, the Competition in Contracting Act, and the Procurement Integrity Act prohibit preferential treatment of one contractor over another and require that Government personnel adhere to the highest standards of conduct and avoid even an appearance of a conflict of interest.