Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Sources Sought opportunity was posted on January 29, 2019. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Sourcing of Naval Vessel Components From the National Technology Industrial Base (NTIB) - Capabilities Assessment Questionnaire

Closed
N00024-19-4114Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 336611
New
SLED
IFB 26-07 Ranger Shipyard Repairs
Solicitation # BD-27-1070-MMA01-PURCH-134561
Massachusetts Maritime Academy is soliciting bids under solicitation number BD-27-1070-MMA01-PURCH-134561 for the dry docking, related inspections, and repairs of the Training Vessel Ranger, a U.S.C.G. inspected school ship. The contractor is responsible for providing all necessary equipment, labor, parts, and materials. The project timeline requires the vessel to be available on December 11, 2026, with the haul-out occurring no later than December 18, 2026, and final completion by February 19, 2027. Core requirements include hauling, blocking, shoring, and relaunching the vessel, with the contractor maintaining the ship out of the water until all dry-dock items and the U.S. Coast Guard hull inspection are complete. Specific tasks include hull zinc replacement, painting of ground tackle and cleats, and rudder shaft packing inspection, with optional services available for cooling system coolant replacement, gunnel repairs, and main deck coating using International Interthane 990 deck red. The contract will be awarded to the responsive and responsible bidder providing the greatest overall value based on cost and evaluation criteria. To be considered responsive, bidders must submit a complete package including bidder information, tax compliance, non-collusion certification, debarment and suspension certification, a price proposal, and three institutional references. The vendor must comply with non-discrimination laws, conduct criminal background and sexual offender registry checks on all personnel, and indemnify the Academy against patent infringement and other damages. Records must be maintained for seven years following final payment. The Academy reserves the right to amend or terminate the contract with or without cause, and the vessel shall not be launched until authorized by an Academy representative.
MMA01 - Massachusetts Maritime Academy

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 14 days

General Info

Agency

N/A

NAICS

336611 - Ship Building and Repairing

Place of Performance

Not specified

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

PhaseClosed
Posted

Sources Sought

Response Deadline

Deadline has passed

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyN/A
Contacts2 people available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
N/A
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Sherri PatsosContracts Specialist
Gerald RobertsonContracting Officer

Full Description

Show more
The Navy requests responders to this RFI to complete the following Capabilities Assessment Questionnaire (in MS Word), addressing the manufacturing of the equipment described below. Examples of such equipment are listed in TABLE A. This RFI is intended to inform the Navy's report in response to Section 841 of the FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) conference report (115-874) which directs that the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) submit to the congressional defense committees a report that provides a recommendation regarding whether competition for the procurement of specific components of naval vessels should be limited to sources in the National Technology and Industrial Base (as defined in section 2500 of title 10, United States Code). The recommendation will be based on a market survey, a cost assessment, and national security considerations for the following group of naval marine components: (1) Naval vessel components listed in section 2534(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code including: (A) The following components: (i) Air circuit breakers. (ii) Welded shipboard anchor and mooring chain with a diameter of four inches or less. (iii) Vessel propellers with a diameter of six feet or more. (B) The following components of vessels, to the extent they are unique to marine applications: (i) gyrocompasses (ii) electronic navigation chart systems (iii) steering controls (iv) pumps (v) propulsion and machinery control systems (vi) totally enclosed lifeboats. (2) The following components for auxiliary ships: (a) Auxiliary equipment, including pumps (b) Propulsion system components, including engines, reduction gears, and propellers (c) Shipboard cranes (d) Spreaders for shipboard cranes DEFINITIONS: Components. For the purpose of this Questionnaire defined as engineered parts of ship systems or sub-systems such as those listed in Table A. Domestic or Domestically-Sourced. Defined as components entirely manufactured within the United States and its territories, Canada, U.K., and Australia. This includes components in the National Technology and Industrial Base (NTIB) as defined in in section 2500 of title 10, United States Code. DISCLAIMER AND IMPORTMANT NOTES: This RFI does not constitute a Request for Proposals (RFP) or a Request for Quote (RFQ). The government does not intend to award a contract based on the information received from this RFI. Information on the specific topics of interest is provided in the subsequent sections of this announcement. Neither the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) nor any other part of the federal government will be responsible for any cost incurred by responders in furnishing this information. TABLE A. EXAMPLES (NOT EXHAUSTIVE) OF COMPONENTS COVERED IN THIS SYNOPSIS. MACHINERY PLANT CENTRAL CONTROL SYSTEMS EMERGENCY PROPULSION PROPULSION REDUCTION GEARS PROPULSION CLUTCHES AND COUPLINGS PROPULSION SHAFTING PROPULSION SHAFT BEARINGS AND SEALS PROPELLERS AND PROPULSORS PROPULSION CONTROL SYSTEM WATERJET PROPULSORS COMBUSTION AIR SYSTEM CIRCULATING AND COOLING SEAWATER SYSTEM FUEL SERVICE SYSTEM MAIN PROPULSION LUBE OIL SYSTEM LUBE OIL FILL, TRANSFER, AND PURIFICATION SHIP SERVICE POWER GENERATION EMERGENCY GENERATORS POWER CONVERSION EQUIPMENT (AIR CIRCUIT BREAKER) SHIP SERVICE POWER DISTRIBUTION (AIR CIRCUIT BREAKER) SWITCHGEAR & PANELS INTEGRATED AFLOAT NETWORKS (MACHINERY CONTROL AND MONITORING SYSTEM) ELECTRONIC NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, CHART DISPLAY & INFORMATION SYSTEM ELECTRICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, GYROCOMPASS SYSTEM INERTIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) REFRIGERATION SYSTEM AUXILIARY BOILERS AND OTHER HEAT SOURCES FIRE MAIN AND FLUSHING (SEA WATER) SYSTEM SPRINKLER SYSTEM AUXILIARY SEA WATER SYSTEM DRAINAGE AND BALLASTING SYSTEM DISTILLING PLANT ELECTRONIC COOLING WATER SYSTEMS POTABLE WATER SYSTEM SHIP FUEL SYSTEM COMPRESSED AIR/GAS SYSTEMS FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS HYDRAULIC FLUID SYSTEM STEERING CONTROL SYSTEMS RUDDERS AND RUDDER COMPONENTS REPLENISHMENT-AT-SEA SYSTEMS CARGO HANDLING SYSTEMS ANCHOR HANDLING AND STOWAGE SYSTEMS (ANCHOR AND MOORING CHAINS) TOTALLY ENCLOSED LIFEBOATS SHIPBOARD CRANES CRANE SPREADERS The Navy requests the following Capabilities Assessment Questionnaire (in MS Office) be completed by responders currently manufacturing, or capable of manufacturing subject equipment. CAPABILITIES ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE: COMPANY DATA Company Name and DBA and Parent's Name, if subsidiary: Address: Telephone: Fax: POC for this RFI: POC Phone: POC Mobile: POC Email: Publicly Traded (specify NYSE, NASDAQ, etc. and Ticker Symbol) or Privately Held: Foreign Ownership, if any and Percentage: CAGE: DUNS: NAICS: Small Business Status, if applicable: QUESTIONS (Size 12 Font) 1. Does your company currently have the capability to manufacture any of the components of the type listed in Table A in production plants located within the National Technology and Industrial Base (U.S., Canada, the U.K. or Australia)? If so, list the components: a. You are currently manufacturing within the NTIB, and/or b. You are not currently manufacturing within the NTIB, but have the capability to manufacture within the NTIB. a. For these, identify the capacity you currently have to manufacture within the NTIB, b. Provide your reasons for not using the capability, and c. Provide the time and cost needed to go to full production. Also, Please complete the Table B attached. You may submit the table as an Excel spreadsheet and add columns for multiple components as necessary. 2. If your company either fully or partially manufactured or procured Table A type components for U.S. naval vessels outside of the NTIB, did you obtain waivers to supply such components for U.S. naval vessels? If so, who was the waiver authority? (e.g. ACO, PCO, SUPSHIPs). (a) List the key reason(s) your company chose to manufacture the components or procure the component(s) from outside the NTIB. 3. If your company currently provides components of the types listed in Table A, is your company impacted positively or negatively, and to what extent (negligible, low, medium, high), by the requirement that only components manufactured within the NTIB may be provided for use in naval vessels? You can include data or metrics (e.g. revenue, profit, personnel, local economy) to support your answers. 4. Does your company have a plan to shift manufacturing operations for previously foreign-sourced and manufactured component(s) to the NTIB? (a) If not, how long would it take for you to develop such a plan? (b) What is the estimated time and cost to implement the plan to reach full rate production in the NTIB? ANSWERING THIS NOTICE: In addition to completing the attached Questionnaire, please provide any questions or comments on a seperate sheet. The desired format for unclassified questions or comments should be in Microsoft Word 2010 or searchable Adobe Acrobat Portable Doucment Format (PDF) with a minimum of 12 point font. All responses must be sent via email to the Contracts Specialist, Sherri Patsos and Contracting Officer, Gerald Robertson, at the following addresses: sherri.patsos@navy.mil and gerald.t.robertson@navy.mil Any questions the Government answers will be added to this FBO posting for all interested vendors knowledge. Proprietary information, if any, must be clearly marked. To aid the Government in its review, please segregate proprietary information. Please be advised that all submissions become Government property and will not be returned.

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS