STUD, TURNLOCK FASTE

The contract pertains to the procurement of 27 units of a STUD, TURNLOCK FASTENER, identified by NSN 5325-01-291-2283, under solicitation SPE4A1-26-T-2121 issued by the Defense Logistics Agency’s Aviation Supply Chain. The item is classified as a commercial item, and delivery is required within 171 days after order placement to the DDSP New Cumberland Facility in Pennsylvania, with FOB Destination terms. The contract mandates strict compliance with DLA packaging requirements, particularly RP001, and packaging must conform to ASTM D3951 unless superseded by the DLA Master List of Technical and Quality Requirements, which governs all technical and quality standards referenced by R or I numbers. All packaging and labeling must adhere to MIL-STD-129, including mandatory barcoding, and hazardous materials must be labeled in accordance with OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard. Inspection and acceptance occur at the destination point by the government, governed by FAR 52.246-2. The solicitation incorporates multiple FAR and DFARS clauses covering equal opportunity, combating trafficking, employment verification, sustainable products, hazardous materials identification, cybersecurity safeguarding, cyber incident reporting, prohibition of covered telecommunications equipment, whistleblower protections, and restrictions on arbitration agreements. The contract requires electronic submission via DIBBS by the deadline of May 27, 2026, and mandates use of WAWF for all invoicing and receiving reports. The contract type is not specified but is to be inserted by the contracting officer. Offerors must provide a Unique Entity Identifier and CAGE code, and disclose socioeconomic status and potential provision of covered defense telecommunications equipment. There is no explicit statement on the basis of award, but the structure and emphasis suggest a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable approach. No contract value is provided due to incomplete pricing structure in Section B, and no attachments or formal Section M evaluation factors are included, leaving the evaluation methodology inferred rather than defined.