SYNCHRO, RECEIVER

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a contract modification, SPE7M526P1304, to General Dynamics Motion Control LLC (CAGE 10112) under solicitation SPE7M5-26-Q-0146 for the procurement of a SYNCHRO, RECEIVER identified by NSN 5990013016796, with a total contract value of $231,880.00. The award was issued on July 15, 2026, and the contract is governed by simplified acquisition procedures under FAR 13.302(a), indicating it was awarded through a streamlined process consistent with its modest value and the nature of the item. The contractor is based in San Diego, California, and the contracting office is administered by DLA Land and Maritime, Maritime Supply Chain, with Michael Finken serving as the Contracting Officer. The contract includes the mandatory FAR clause 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, utilizing Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which requires the contractor to comply with federal policies prohibiting discrimination in employment practices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. No detailed specifications, delivery schedules, or inspection criteria are explicitly outlined in the available documentation, though the item’s NSN and CAGE code suggest compliance with standard Department of Defense logistics and identification protocols. The place of performance is not formally designated, though the contractor’s facility in San Diego is referenced. Packaging, marking, barcoding, and shipping terms such as FOB are not specified, implying adherence to default military standards like MIL-STD-129 may apply, though not formally cited. Invoicing procedures and payment details are limited to the DLA Land and Maritime remittance address in Columbus, Ohio, with no formal invoicing system like WAWF or IPP mandated in the records. Evaluation factors and award methodology are not disclosed, but the low dollar value and singular line item suggest an LPTA approach was likely used. No representations regarding small business status, socioeconomic certifications, or unique entity identifiers beyond the CAGE code are provided, and no Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative is listed. The contract’s administrative framework relies on electronic communication via DIBBS and Standard Form 30 for modifications, with all official correspondence directed through the designated contracting officer.