Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Government Contract opportunity from Department Of Defense was posted on September 5, 2023. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Synopsis/Intent to Sole Source - Type C Architect-Engineer Services for Repair Bldg. 51 Project

Awarded
W50S87-23-R-5006Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541330
New
SLED
Fire Alarm engineering for Lewis County
Solicitation # 2026-RFQ-040
Lewis County is soliciting qualifications under solicitation 2026-RFQ-040 for a professional engineering firm to provide comprehensive design and engineering services for fire alarm systems. The project encompasses several County-owned facilities, including the IT Building, Historic Courthouse, Health Building, and Lewis County Jail. The selected firm will be responsible for conducting on-site evaluations to determine the remaining useful life of existing systems, assessing code compliance with NFPA 72, IBC, and IFC standards, and developing bid-ready construction drawings and technical specifications. All designs must be stamped by a licensed electrical engineer familiar with Washington State fire alarm requirements and must integrate smoothly with existing infrastructure to ensure standardized maintenance and operations. Proposals are due by November 10, 2026, via the OpenGov platform and will be evaluated by a committee of at least three County employees using a points-based system. The evaluation criteria are equally weighted at 20 percent each across four categories: firm qualifications (including NICET certifications and licensed engineer availability), responsiveness and capacity to begin work within 30 days, regulatory compliance and permitting records, and the clarity and detail of blueprint designs. Applicants must provide a statement of qualifications, three public agency references from the last five years, and resumes of key personnel. The contract is administered by Matt Patana, Capital Infrastructure Specialist, based in Chehalis, Washington.
Capital Infrastructure

POSTED

about 19 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 21 days

General Info

NAICS

541330 - Engineering Services

Place of Performance

Charlotte, NC, 28208, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

1

J&A - A-E Type C Services - Repair Bldg. 51

PDF, Low priorityjustification-and-authorization
Low

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Contract not broken down yet

CLEATUS splits the solicitation into Uniform Contract Format (UCF) sections: scope, pricing, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.

Timeline

2 updates
PhaseAwarded
Posted

special-notice

Deadline changed

Response deadline changed from Aug 15, 2023 to Aug 30, 2023.

Notice updated

Notice details unchanged. Attachments may have changed.

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Defense → W7NS Uspfo Activity Ncang 145
Contacts1 person available
OfficeCHARLOTTE, NC, 28208-3866, USA
Office AddressCHARLOTTE, NC, 28208-3866, USA
Contacts
Zachary D. Leddy

Full Description

Show more
The 145th Mission Support Group Contracting office in Charlotte, NC intends to issue a written request for proposal and resulting firm-fixed price sole source award to Tetra Tech/Mead and Hunt Joint Venture (TTMHJV). This sole source award will be for Type - C services for construction contract administration for the Repair Bldg. 51 project. Type - C services include but are not limited to documenting and providing answers to contractor's requests for information, submittal reviews, attendance and records at progress meetings, review of lab results, preparation of as-built drawings, and multiple site visits to inspect the building during construction. This requirement is a follow-on award to TTMHJV. The requirement was previously negotiated and awarded via task order W50S87-20-F-5027. That award included Type A and B services for the design of the Repair Bldg. 51 project. Type A services included the basis of design (specifically the design intent), the development of the project concept, and associated site investigations. The Type B services included the design narrative and the development of the construction documents. Because TTMHJV designed and certified the drawings and specifications and is liable for the quality of their design, it is economical and efficient to award the Type C services as a sole source follow-on contract. There is tremendous performance and liability risk associated with another A-E firm taking over the Type C services for a project that was designed by a different firm. Having the original designer, TTMHJV, on contract to perform the construction phase services is necessary for the Government to ensure responsibility for their design, including ensuring the design is constructible, maintainable and operable, that the project documentation is clear, sufficiently detailed, accurate and coordinated, and contains minimal errors. An award to a new A-E other than TTMHJV would increase the risk associated with these issues and potentially affect the Government's rights under FAR 52.236-23, Responsibility of the Architect-Engineer Contractor, if another A-E were to represent or attempt to revise the current drawings and/or specifications. This clause states that the - Contractor shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished by the Contractor. However, if a new A-E were to make recommendations during the Type C services to revise or deviate from the original drawings or specifications, any liability resulting from those changes could not be attributed to the original A-E. This could potentially create a dangerous and complicated scenario if the Government needed to hold the responsible A-E party liable for any errors or deficiencies in the designs, drawings, and/or specifications. This action is being taken using the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1), as implemented by FAR 6.302-1(a)(2), Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS