TRANSMITTER, LIQUID

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A626PB109 to GMS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (CAGE 0JGJ8) on July 21, 2026, for the procurement of one unit of a TRANSMITTER, LIQUID (NSN 6680011485824) at a total contract value of $58,328.16. The solicitation, numbered SPE4A5-26-T-3207, was issued under the NAICS code 334513 for Electronic Component and Product Manufacturing, with no set-aside designation specified. The contract was executed as a modification (P00001) using Standard Form 30, and the award was made under the authority of FAR 43.203(b). The contractor’s place of business is located in Reston, VA, though the official place of performance is not explicitly defined in the documentation. The Contracting Officer, Dean Allen of DLA Aviation, ASC Commodities Division in Richmond, VA, is responsible for administration, with no designated COR or COTR identified. Payment details, accounting codes, invoicing methods, and delivery schedules are not specified, though the contract is presumed to be a firm-fixed-price arrangement without options or extensions. The contract incorporates FAR 52.222-90, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” implemented through DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which imposes mandatory reporting obligations on the contractor regarding compliance with non-discriminatory DEI practices and requires disclosure of any subcontractor violations or related legal actions. This clause applies to all subcontracts and is enforceable by contract termination for noncompliance. No technical specifications, MIL-STDs, packaging, marking, or quality standards were provided in the available documentation, and inspection and acceptance protocols are inferred to follow standard government procedures without detailed criteria outlined. The contractor’s Unique Entity ID was not explicitly listed, and there are no certifications or representations regarding small business status or socioeconomic designation. While electronic communication via CARL.ALLEN@DLA.MIL is referenced and the solicitation was posted on DIBBS, submission details such as deadlines, acceptable file formats, and portal requirements remain unspecified. The contract appears administrative in nature, relying on regulatory compliance rather than detailed technical or performance specifications.