TRANSMITTER, PRESSUR

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a contract modification, SPE4A526P2036, to Kulite Semiconductor Products Inc. with CAGE code 34345 for the supply of one transmitter, pressur, identified by NSN 6685014965909, at a total price of $338,350.00, with an award date of July 21, 2026. The solicitation, SPE4A5-26-T-2443, was issued under the NAICS code 334513 for instrument manufacturing for measuring and testing, and the contract was administered by DLA Aviation in Richmond, VA, with performance and delivery occurring at the contractor’s facility in Leonia, New Jersey. The contract includes the mandatory flow-down clause FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, as modified by DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040 Revision 1, requiring the contractor to prohibit discriminatory practices in employment and subcontracting, report violations, and provide access to records for compliance reviews. The contract is executed as an administrative modification under FAR 43.203(b), with no explicit contract type stated, though its fixed-price structure and single line item suggest a firm-fixed-price arrangement. No packaging, marking, preservation, inspection criteria, or technical specifications beyond the NSN were specified, and no MIL-STD or other military standards were referenced. The place of performance is clearly defined as the contractor’s site in New Jersey, but delivery terms, FOB conditions, period of performance, and invoicing procedures remain unspecified. The procuring contracting officer is Dean Allen, with no designated COR or COTR identified. The contractor holds a valid CAGE code but has not submitted certifications regarding size status or socioeconomic designation, and no unique entity identifier was provided. No attachments, special requirements, or evaluation factors were included in the documentation, indicating an administrative award focused on compliance with DEI mandates rather than technical competition. The accounting and appropriation data, payment office, and inspection locations are either missing or implied through administrative channels, with no WAWF, IPP, or other invoicing system specified.