48--VALVE,GATE

MORPAC INDUSTRIES, INC, with CAGE code 66822, has been awarded contract SPE7M125P6172 by the Defense Logistics Agency under solicitation SPE7M1-25-T-9867, with an award date of July 15, 2026, and a total contract value of $88,125.39. The contract encompasses three identical line items for the procurement of gate valves identified by NSN 4810014323860, each associated with unique purchase request numbers but identical in description, indicating a bulk acquisition of the same component. The contract is administered by DLA Land and Maritime, Maritime Supply Chain ESOC Buys, located in Columbus, Ohio, with the contractor’s remittance address in Pacific, Washington. The contracting officer is Michael Finken, reachable via email and phone, though no Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative is identified. No detailed specifications, statement of work, or technical drawings are provided in the available documentation, with references to a "Continuation Sheet" suggesting that full technical requirements may reside in unprovided supplemental materials. The contract includes the FAR clause 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, which imposes compliance obligations regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in employment and operations. There is no explicit information on the period of performance, delivery schedule, FOB terms, or inspection and acceptance locations, though delivery is presumed to originate from the contractor’s facility in Washington and be received at a DLA logistics site in Ohio. While the contract structure suggests a firm-fixed-price type consistent with standard DLA procurements, the exact contract type is not formally stated. No evaluation factors, weights, or selection methodology are disclosed, and no socioeconomic certifications or small business status are indicated. Invoicing is likely conducted through WAWF, as is standard for DLA contracts, though not explicitly confirmed. Packaging, marking, and quality assurance standards are not detailed, and no applicable MIL-STDs or inspection criteria are referenced, leaving these requirements presumably defined elsewhere in supporting technical documents. The contract contains no options, no special security or OCI provisions, and no key personnel requirements, with all administrative actions to be processed through DIBBS. The absence of quantified line-item details, delivery timelines, and performance benchmarks underscores that this is a streamlined procurement driven by pre-established catalogs or existing