48--VALVE,SAFETY RELIEF

The U.S. Defense Logistics Agency awarded LESLIE CONTROLS, INC. (CAGE 35795) a contract valued at $950,856.00 for the procurement of a safety relief valve identified by NSN 4820013322642, under solicitation SPE7M4-26-Q-0096, with the award issued on July 13, 2026. The contract was issued as a modification (P00001) to a previously established order dated December 9, 2025, and is administered by DLA Land and Maritime, Maritime Supply Chain, with the contracting officer being Michael Finken, reachable via email and phone. The contractor’s performance location is implied to be their facility in Tampa, Florida, though the official place of performance is not explicitly defined in the documentation. Payment responsibilities are assigned to DLA Land and Maritime, located in Columbus, Ohio, with a paying office code of 35795, though specific remittance instructions, invoicing systems, or accounting data such as AAC, TAS, or ACRN are not provided. The contract does not specify delivery schedules, FOB terms, quantities, unit prices, or inspection locations, and no options or extended performance periods are included. The scope of work centers on a single line item, with no detailed technical specifications or performance criteria disclosed beyond the NSN designation. Compliance with FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, is required and was incorporated via a deviation effective April 2026, with the clause being added through an amendment matched to the award date. This represents the only explicitly referenced clause and serves as a unique contractual obligation surrounding diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. No other FAR clauses, special contract requirements, or mandatory representations and certifications beyond the contractor’s CAGE code are detailed in the documentation. The contractor’s size status, socioeconomic designations, affirmative action commitments, or compliance affirmations under Section K are not disclosed. Packaging, marking, and preservation standards are not explicitly outlined but are presumed to align with Department of Defense logistics practices, including likely adherence to MIL-STD-129 and MIL-STD-2073 by implication. The inspection and acceptance process lacks defined criteria, locations, or responsible parties. There is no mention of key personnel, security clearances, organizational conflict of