WINDOW, VEHICULAR

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC a delivery order valued at $2,313.41 under the basic contract SPE7LX23D0005, with the specific order number SPE7LX26FB377, issued on July 16, 2026. The contract encompasses the procurement of eleven vehicular windows identified by NSN 2510016082842 and manufacturer part number 3872113, to be delivered in full to the DLA Distribution facility in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, by October 5, 2026. Delivery is under FOB ORIG DEST DEST terms, meaning the contractor assumes responsibility for transportation to the final destination, with risk transferring upon arrival. The contract is structured as a firm-fixed-price, single-line-item delivery order under an indefinite-quantity vehicle, with no option quantities or extended periods defined. Payment will be processed through the Defense Finance and Accounting Service using payment code SL4701, with invoices submitted per DFARS 252.232-7003, and all shipments must be marked with the NSN, CAGE code 75Q65, part number, parcel identifier W25G1U, and batch/delivery number, adhering to standard DoD logistics practices though no specific MIL-STD is cited. The order is designated as rated under the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS), requiring priority handling, and the contractor has been identified as women-owned based on a selectable checkbox in the contract, though other socioeconomic certifications are unclaimed. The Government will perform inspection and acceptance at the delivery point, with sign-off required by an authorized representative. Contract administration is managed by Samuel Freidet as the Authorized Government Representative and Michael Proskurenko as the local DLA Land and Maritime administrator, with no formally designated COR or COTR identified. Packaging and marking details are referenced to a separate contractual attachment, which is not included in the provided documentation, and no technical specifications or performance standards beyond conformance to the contract are specified. The award appears to follow a lowest-priced technically acceptable approach due to the simplicity of the requirement, the lack of non-price evaluation factors, and absence of technical or past performance reviews in the record.