Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

10 -- Wide Area Search Synthetic Aperture Radar (WASSAR) - PART 2 OF 2

Active
MNK-BAA-06-0001C-PART2OF2Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

AI Contract Overview

Show more

The contract relates to the Wide Area Search Synthetic Aperture Radar (WASSAR) program, with an anticipated total performance period of 39 months, which includes a three-month phase to finalize the technical report. The government plans to award a single cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, expected to be finalized by late September 2006, with a total funding profile estimated at just over $5 million spread across four fiscal years, though funding levels are not guaranteed. The contract prohibits prime contractor foreign ownership unless exceptions are approved through the US State Department and require facility clearances. Offerors must identify any hazardous materials used during the project and comply with specific requirements for technical data requests. Proposals must include a detailed white paper and technical and cost volumes, following strict page limits and formatting requirements. White papers should demonstrate the soundness of the technical approach, risk assessment, past relevant performance, and cost estimates. Technical proposals require detailed statements of work, schedules, and a thorough explanation of how the program system requirements will be met, including summaries of key personnel experience with multi-mode radar development. The cost proposal must provide labor and expense breakdowns, reflecting all contract costs and any government-furnished equipment. Evaluation criteria prioritize technical merit, capabilities and experience, cost realism, and small disadvantaged business participation, with awards based on best value. Points of contact for contracting and technical matters are provided for offerors seeking further guidance.

General Info

39-month WASSAR radar contract, $5M+, cost-plus-fixed-fee, technical data and security compliance required.

Agency

N/A

NAICS

334511 - Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Place of Performance

Not specified

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

Posted

special-notice

Ready to pursue this opportunity?

Get full access to track this contract, build proposals with AI assistance, and manage your pipeline.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyN/A
Contacts1 person available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
N/A
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Robin L GibsonContract Specialist

Full Description

Show more
(PART 2 OF 2) C-- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: (1) Anticipated Period of Performance: The total contract performance period is 39 months total, including a three month period after the technical effort to complete the Final Technical Report. (2) Expected Award Date: The estimated award date is late Sept 2006. (3) Type of Contract: The Government anticipates awarding a single cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) contract. (4) Government Estimate: The Government anticipates that the WASSAR Seeker program then-year-dollars profile for funding available for the contracted effort will be as follows: FY06 - .028 M, FY07 - $1.621M, FY08 -$2.068 M, FY09 - $1.336 M. However, this statement shall not be interpreted as an obligation on the part of the Government to fund the WASSAR program at the stated annual levels. (5) Request for Technical Annex: Technical annex may be obtained by sending a certified copy of a DD Form 2345, Militarily Critical Technical Data Agreement, appropriate clearance data, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, and approved mailing address to the programmatic points of contact in Section F(2) via mail or fax. After acceptance of these items, this data package may be obtained in person or via mail. Request should be provided early enough to allow the Government 10 days to provide the document. No supplemental documentation will be provided unless requested in strict accordance with these instructions. (6) Notice to Foreign Owned Firms: A determination has been made for this solicitation that all foreign participation at the prime contractor level will be prohibited. Exceptions may include those contractors with an agreement with the US State Department and a current facility clearance, copies of which should be provided to Section F Points of contact. (7) Hazardous Materials: The contractor must identify any hazardous materials to be used in performance of this effort in the white paper and any subsequently requested formal proposal. D--WHITE PAPER AND PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS: (1) General: All offerors should apply the restrictive notice prescribed in the provision at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.215-1 (e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, to trade secrets or privileged commercial and financial information contained in their white paper and proposals. The offeror must provide sufficient technical detail and discussion to establish the soundness of the proposed approach, provide an adequate basis for assessing program technical cost and schedule risk, and form a sound basis for the proposed cost. The offeror must demonstrate knowledge of the systems engineering process and make realistic assumptions of how the proposed technology increases performance at the missile system level. A white paper or proposal failing to provide adequate technical detail and discussion may be considered technically unresponsive to this BAA Special Amendment. Questions should be directed to the appropriate points of contact listed in Section F. (2) White Papers: White papers shall address all areas indicated by the Evaluation Factors in Section E - Basis for Award, including how the contractor intends to achieve, for the entire program, the system requirements and applicable parameters outlined in Section B'Requirements, of this Amendment. The contractor must also provide a summary of relevant past and present performance. This summary should highlight efforts by the proposed program manager, lead technical investigator and/or chief engineer supporting relevant multi-mode RADAR development programs within the last five years. State the capacity in which these individuals acted in these relevant programs. Include a list of pertinent contracts, experiences, reference points of contact, phone numbers, etc., and any resumes in a separate appendix. A rough order of magnitude cost estimate shall be provided which indicates Government fiscal year funding as well as major subcontractor cost requirements. Additionally, the white paper shall include any partners, subcontractors, etc., to be utilized, discuss risk (technical, cost, schedule) assessment and technology maturity level required to meet system requirements and applicable parameters. Finally, the white papers should be structured to reflect the basic effort and two priced options described in Section B(2) above. (3) Technical Proposal: For the formal proposal, submit separate Technical and Cost Volumes and mark them as valid for 180 days. Volume 1, Technical Proposal, shall include, as a minimum, a detailed Statement of Work (SOW) and contract schedule for each individual priced option, as described in Section B(2). Volume 1 should fully address the approach in accomplishing the program system requirements and applicable parameters of Section B above. As noted in Section D(2), the contractor must also provide a summary of relevant past and present performance. This summary should highlight efforts by the proposed program manager, lead technical investigator and/or chief engineer supporting relevant multi-mode RADAR development programs within the last five years. State the capacity in which these individuals acted in these relevant programs. Include a list of pertinent contracts, experiences, reference points of contact, phone numbers, etc., and any resumes in a separate appendix. Volume 1 should be unclassified, if possible. Any classified material must be provided in a separate annex and must be properly marked and handled as such. Any classified material should be provided directly to the programmatic points of contact in section F(2), rather than to contracting points of contact. (4) Cost Proposal: The Volume 2, Cost proposal, must include and segregate the contract costs, and also provide a total summary. It must reflect the basic effort and priced options described in Section B(2) separately. The contract costs shall include, as a minimum, a labor category and man-hour breakdown including applicable labor rates, a cost element summary including labor, material, travel, other direct costs, overheads, G&A, etc., and reflecting all rates for the contract and data, and a monthly expenditure schedule for the entire program. The offeror shall include estimates for the cost/value of any Government-Furnished Equipment/Property/Information, etc. requested, and all costs expected to be incurred by the Government associated with providing the equipment, facilities, support, etc., necessary to meet the contractor's testing requirements. Volume 2, Cost Proposal, must be unclassified and should address the price, cost details, and a risk assessment of the proposal. The anticipated award for Basic CLIN 0001 and option CLINs 0002 and 0003 combined is expected not to exceed $5.053 Million. Any awardee should expect to certify cost and pricing data in accordance with FAR 15. (5) Page Limitations: White papers are limited to 30 pages, which will include a ROM cost estimate. Formal Technical Proposal shall be limited to a total of 50 pages, including charts, figures, tables, etc. The Government reserves the right to remove and return to the offeror any excess pages before the formal evaluation starts. Proposed SOWs, resumes and relevant past and present performance may be included as appendices, and will not be counted in the page limitations. Although Past and Present Performance information should be discussed in the White Paper and/or Volume 1, Technical Proposal, a list of pertinent contracts, experience, points of contact, phone numbers, etc., and any resumes, should be in a separate appendix, which is not included in the White Paper for Technical Proposal page limitations. Formal Cost Proposal will have no page limitation; however, the offeror is requested to keep the cost proposal to 30 pages or less, if possible. Cost proposal spreadsheets must be submitted in Microsoft Excel format. A page is defined to be one side of an 8.5 x 11-inch piece of paper with information on it. Minimum print size is 12-pitch, using Arial or Times New Roman font, with line spacing of not less than one and one-half for the typeface used (no more than 34 lines per page) for the formal proposal. White papers may be single-spaced. The white paper and potential proposal shall be submitted as an original document and six paper copies, and one copy should be submitted on CD or DVD. Note: Submittal of a white paper or proposal constitutes contractor's authorization for limited reproduction and dissemination within Government agencies and National Laboratories for evaluation purposes only, as stated in FAR 52.215-1(e). (6) Preparation Costs: The cost of preparing a white paper or proposal in response to this announcement is not considered an allowable direct charge to any resulting contract, or any other contract. It is, however, an allowable expense to the normal bid and proposal indirect cost specified in FAR 31.205-18. Offerors are advised that only the Contracting Officer is legally authorized to contractually bind or otherwise obligate the Government. The US Air Force reserves the right to award one or no contracts based on the proposal received. E--BASIS FOR AWARD: Evaluation Criteria: White papers and the proposal will be evaluated as to their projected success in achieving system requirements and applicable parameters outlined in Section B--Requirements, of this BAA Special Amendment, utilizing the Factors and Sub-factors below. Additionally, a risk assessment will be made of the offers, and selections will be made based on the Best Value to the Government. Awards may be made without discussions. Factors are listed in descending order of importance. Although cost is less important than technical, it is still considered significant. Factor (1) Scientific/Technical Merit - Subfactors (a) through (c) in Factor (1) are of equal importance a. Soundness of offeror's proposed technical approach to include all study, design, and development efforts, program schedule including meetings and milestones, deliverables and data requirements, technical data rights, and other items specified in this Special Amendment to the BAA. b. Extent to which the offeror demonstrates that the system requirements and applicable parameters can be met with the proposed technologies c. Extent to which existing target classification algorithms for mobile targets (moving and stationary) can be utilized for the proposed system Factor (2) Capabilities and Experience (Includes Past and Present Performance) - Offeror's capabilities, related experience (including past and present performance), facilities, techniques or unique combinations of these, which are integral factors for achieving proposal objectives. Past performance will be based on work performed on programs of similar scope and complexity within the last five years. Factor (3) Cost - Reasonableness and realism of proposed costs. The total cost to be evaluated will include the cost of performing the contract system requirements and applicable parameters, the cost of testing, and any applicable costs for Government Furnished Equipment/Material. Awards made under this Special Amendment to the BAA are dependent upon funds availability. Factor (4) Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Participation - The extent to which SDB concerns are specifically identified as participants will be evaluated. F--POINTS OF CONTACT: (1) Contracting and Cost: The primary point of contact is Ms Robin Gibson, Contract Specialist, +1 (555) 000-0000, or e-mail to contact@example.gov. The alternate is Ms Brenda Soler, Contracting Officer, +1 (555) 000-0000, or e-mail to contact@example.gov. The mailing address for both is AFRL/MNK, 101 West Eglin Blvd., Suite 337, Eglin AFB FL 32542-6810. The AFRL/MNK telefax number is +1 (555) 000-0000. (2) Programmatic and Technical: Refer to both Mr Tim Jones, +1 (555) 000-0000 and Mr Dave Hayden +1 (555) 000-0000, at AFRL/MNGS, 101 West Eglin Blvd., Suite 287, Eglin AFB FL 32542-6810, or e-mail contact@example.gov and contact@example.gov. The AFRL/MNGS telefax number is +1 (555) 000-0000. (3) General information: This announcement and updated or other general information are available via the World Wide Web at http://www.fbo.gov (Look for Solicitation Number MNK-BAA-06-0001C). (PART 2 OF 2)

Similar Contracts

Same NAICS industry code

NAICS: 334511
New
DIBBS
TAG, CASUALTY TRIAGE
Solicitation # SPE2DS-27-T-1137
Solicitation SPE2DS-27-T-1137, issued by the DLA Troop Support Medical Supply Chain, is a request for quotations for the procurement of one package of Casualty Triage Tags (NSN 6515-01-587-1700). These combat casualty cards are designed for patient documentation during the three phases of tactical combat casualty care and are constructed from waterproof, tear-resistant ruggedized paper. Each tag features a grommet-reinforced punch and is sized to fit into an Individual First Aid Kit (IFAK). The required unit of issue is a package containing 25 tags, with pack dimensions of 6 by 4.5 by 1.5 inches and a weight of 5.5 ounces. The contract requires strict adherence to DLA packaging and marking standards, specifically RP001, ASTM D3951, and Medical Marking Standard No. 1, which supersedes MIL-STD-129 for medical materials. Delivery is required by November 2, 2026, with destination inspection mandated under FAR 52.246-2. Administrative requirements include the use of the Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) system for invoicing and payment. The procurement is subject to the Buy American Act and DFARS 252.225-7001, and it incorporates specific cybersecurity and telecommunications restrictions. Evaluation may include a price preference for HUBZone small businesses, and all offerors must maintain active certifications in the System for Award Management (SAM).
MEDICAL SUPPLY CHAIN MD SURG FSF

POSTED

about 7 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 6 days
View Details

Earlier notices in this NAICS code

Posted before this notice, open and closed

Ready to Pursue This Opportunity?

Get AI-powered intelligence on this solicitation and the ones like it

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS