1356 - 1356-01-106-5985; WW98; Initiating Propellant; DWG: 2508738 REV AA

This contract is an Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) award for the production of Initiating Propellant, identified by NSN 1356-01-106-5985 and drawing number 2508738 REV AA, issued under solicitation N0010426RK043 by the Navy Supply Systems Command Weapon Systems Support in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. The estimated contract period spans three years, from November 30, 2026, to November 30, 2029, with a guaranteed minimum order of 599 units and a maximum total contract quantity of 4,200 units across all option periods, with no more than 1,400 units per delivery order. Pricing is structured in tiers tied to delivery timing under DADC periods, though exact unit prices are not provided. The item is classified as an explosive, requiring strict adherence to hazardous materials regulations including 49 CFR, DOT, and UN standards, with specific labeling as “PROPELLANT EXPLOSIVES {SOLID} CLASS B” and packaging markings compliant with UN 1A2/Y4.3/S/** USA/DOD/NAD and a Controlled Inventory Item Code of 7. All items must be marked with unique identification per MIL-STD-130, shipped with labels conforming to MIL-STD-129R, and accompanied by ammunition lot numbers formatted under MIL-STD-1168C and documented via the WARP system’s Ammunition Data Card. Production must comply with specification WS12984 Rev AA and ISO 9001 certification standards, with inspection performed at the contractor’s facility under F.o.b. Origin terms, where the contractor is responsible for maintaining a documented quality assurance system using MIL-STD-105 and MIL-STD-1916 with inspection levels and AQLs varying by criticality. First Article Testing is required at 180 DADC, and technical data must be delivered 365 days after FAT approval. All deliveries are directed to Tooele, Utah, and Keyport, Washington, with test samples retained at the contractor’s site. Proposals must be submitted electronically in five volumes by the deadline of August 28, 2026, and evaluated based on a best value trade-off, with technical approach and past performance equally critical, followed by small business