470c2 MontelloFY2026

-Firewall: -Estimated Quantity: 1 license - Manufacturer: Meraki or equivalent- -The request is for license only; no hardware is being purchased- -Proposed license must be fully compatible and interoperable with the district's existing Meraki MX250 - -Request is for 5 year license(s)- -Single/Multi-year licenses: structured such that the service dates for each license year coincide precisely with the E-rate Funding Year's start and end dates (i.e., July 1st through June 30th)- -Recipients of Service (count and list of entities): (3) Forest Lane Community Elementary, High Marq Enviroment Charter, Junior/Senior High-
-WAP: -Estimated Quantity: 76 licenses - Manufacturer: Meraki or equivalent- -The request is for licenses only; no hardware is being purchased- -Proposed license must be fully compatible and interoperable with the district's existing Meraki wireless access points - -Request is for 5 year license(s)- -Single/Multi-year licenses: structured such that the service dates for each license year coincide precisely with the E-rate Funding Year's start and end dates (i.e., July 1st through June 30th)- -Recipients of Service (count and list of entities): (3) Forest Lane Community Elementary, High Marq Enviroment Charter, Junior/Senior High-
-Switches: -Estimated Quantity: 14 licenses - Manufacturer: Meraki or equivalent- -The request is for licenses only; no hardware is being purchased- -Proposed license must be fully compatible and interoperable with the district's existing Meraki switches - -Request is for 5 year license(s)- -Single/Multi-year licenses: structured such that the service dates for each license year coincide precisely with the E-rate Funding Year's start and end dates (i.e., July 1st through June 30th)- -Recipients of Service (count and list of entities): (3) Forest Lane Community Elementary, High Marq Enviroment Charter, Junior/Senior High-
-Installation, Configuration and Activation: Necessary Installation, Configuration and Activation for eligible services. For multiple service requests in general, ICA/Labor should be listed for each service request. If aggregated together, ICA must contain clear detail description of the allocation of ICA for each relevant service request. -Proposal Disqualification Warning: SPAM and/or robotic responses will not be considered valid bid responses and will be disqualified from consideration.
-Important Reminders to Service Providers/Vendors: -1. Read the Proposal Overview (file name: Proposal Overview 2BSIGNED Not an RFP) downloadable from the 470 application RFPS. Note: remember to add the manufacturer to the line item in the price proposal, either in a separate column, or within the item description, if relevant.- -2. Once downloaded sign the Proposal Overview and name the file Proposal Overview - Service Provider (Actual Service Provider Name Inserted)- -3. Be sure to include this Proposal Overview file as an attachment to your submitted proposal to the district.- -4. Reminder: The 470 application provides the District's best estimate of the number of items we are seeking in the "Quantity" field in order to indicate to potential service providers the size and scope of our project in the 470. Service providers are free to propose a higher or lower number in their proposals based on their assessment of our needs, if the proposals are clearly responding to our needs as described in the FCC Form 470. Cat1 requests are a bit more restrictive, but can provide a range of defined bandwidths.- -5. The District will select the most cost-effective proposal. The price of the eligible products and services must be the primary factor in the evaluation, but does not have to be the sole factor. The District will also consider additional factors such as the capabilities of manufacturer products/services proposed. The most effective fit between the service provider and the District, from the District's perspective, will be considered. The service provider's actions to construct a proper proposal per the District's expectations will also be evaluated. The District may consider other factors at their discretion. The District values valid clinical communication that does not provide an unfair advantage over any other participating service providers. For emphasis again: Price will be the highest weighted factor in the evaluation of proposals.-
Requested services (3 line items): - Category 2 — Internal Connections — Switches And Necessary Software And Licenses - Category 2 — Internal Connections — Wireless Access Points And Necessary Software And Licenses - Category 2 — Internal Connections — Firewall Service, Components, And Necessary Software And Licenses
State/local procurement requirements: The district has policy and administrative regulations regarding purchasing requirements. Please contact the Technical Contact to acquire detailed rules and information that may be relevant to the negotiation processes.
Reference documents (Form 470 / RFP): https://publicdata.usac.org/EPC/Prd/Form470/260016913/133075/20994631-USAC_FCC_FORM_470_APPLICATION_260016913_CERTIFIED.pdf, https://publicdata.usac.org/EPC/Prd/Form470/260016913/133075/20994321-Proposal%20Overview%202BSIGNED%20Not%20an%20RFP.pdf