Administrative Design Review 25-0015 - Perez Gardens

The Administrative Design Review 25-0015 for Perez Gardens in Cathedral City, California, authorizes a change in use for a 921 square foot space within an existing cannabis cultivation facility, transitioning the room’s function from cannabis manufacturing to cannabis cultivation. This modification revises previously approved floor plans under CUP 18-021A and subsequent amendments ADR 22-022 and ADR 25-0004, with no structural additions or site alterations proposed. The project qualifies for a commonsense exemption under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as the change is not anticipated to result in significant environmental impacts, and compliance is further supported by references to CEQA sections 21083, 21110, 21108, 21152, and 21152.1. The application was submitted by Perez Gardens, owned by Xuefeng Yao, and approved by the City of Cathedral City, with a signed exemption notice dated January 15, 2026, and publicly posted on January 20, 2026. The project’s place of performance is confirmed at 68796 Perez Road, Cathedral City, and the primary point of contact is Dominique Camps, Associate Planner, reachable through the city’s Office of Planning and Research. While the documentation describes a land-use modification under local regulatory authority, it does not constitute a federal procurement contract and contains no Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, contract value, pricing, payment terms, delivery schedules, or performance metrics typically found in federally funded agreements. There are no designated contracting officer’s representatives, accounting codes, invoicing procedures, or required certifications such as UEI, CAGE codes, or socioeconomic status identifiers. The only required submission is a certified document of exemption finding, with no formal proposal format, deadlines, or electronic submission platform specified. The process is administrative in nature, focused on environmental compliance and design review under California law rather than competitive procurement, and no standard contract type, delivery terms, inspection criteria, or special requirements are outlined in the materials.