ATOMIZER, MEDICINAL

The contract solicitation, identified by SPE2DS-26-T-272K, seeks the procurement of two units of a medicinal atomizer with NSN 6515-01-486-0832, a disposable, sterile nasal delivery device featuring a Luer lock connection. The requirement is issued by the Defense Logistics Agency under the Department of Defense, with delivery due within 20 days after order placement to Fort Bliss, Texas. All items must comply with stringent packaging and marking regulations, specifically MIL-STD-2073-1E for packaging and Medical Marking Standard No. 1 for labeling, which supersedes MIL-STD-129 for medical acquisitions. Barcoding per DoD standards is mandatory, and hazardous material handling must adhere to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard, DFARS 252.223-7001, and federal labeling laws, requiring pre-award submission of hazard labels and Safety Data Sheets. The contract applies fixed-price terms under FAR 52.216-1, with inspection and acceptance occurring at the destination, governed by FAR 52.246-2. Invoicing is strictly through WAWF, with electronic submission required for payment processing. The solicitation includes numerous FAR and DFARS clauses addressing small business representation, cybersecurity (including NIST SP 800-171), subcontracting, contractor information safeguarding, whistleblower protections, procurement of covered telecommunications equipment, and accelerated payments to small business subcontractors. Deviations are authorized under deviation 2026-00038 and 2026-00025 for multiple clauses including system maintenance, contract type, and safeguarding requirements. Offerors must provide their Unique Entity ID and CAGE code and represent their small business status to qualify under applicable socioeconomic programs. Proposals are to be submitted electronically via the DLA Internet Bid Board System by August 3, 2026, with no paper submissions permitted. All contract clauses include administrative placeholders for contracting officer details, and no formal evaluation factors or award basis are explicitly stated, though price and technical compliance are implied as evaluation criteria. The contract value is not specified in the solicitation, and no attachments are formally listed.