BAG, SMOKES RESCUE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a simplified acquisition to LIFESAVING SYSTEMS LLC for 23 units of BAG, SMOKES RESCUE (NSN 4240015193180) under solicitation SPE8E6-26-T-3840, with a total contract value of $13,030.19 and an award date of July 29, 2026. Delivery is scheduled for September 20, 2026, with an original required delivery date of November 3, 2026, and is triggered by an as-directed order (ADO), with shipments destined for DLA Distribution San Diego at 3581 Cummings Road, BLDG 3581, San Diego, CA 92136-3581 under FOB Destination terms. The contract is governed by a comprehensive set of Federal Acquisition Regulation and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clauses, including mandatory cybersecurity requirements under DFARS 252.204-7012 requiring compliance with NIST SP 800-171 and reporting of cyber incidents within 72 hours, as well as stringent hazardous materials handling obligations per FED-STD-313 and TQ Requirement IP025, including pre-award submission of Safety Data Sheets and hazardous warning labels compliant with 29 CFR 1910.1200. Packaging and labeling must adhere to MIL-STD-129, ASTM D3951, and RP001, with the DLA Master List of Technical and Quality Requirements taking precedence, and all shipments must be barcoded using Data Matrix or linear barcodes. Invoicing is exclusively through Wide Area WorkFlow, and payment requests must be submitted electronically with accompanying receiving reports. The contract includes provisions for accelerated payments to small businesses, restrictions on unauthorized obligations, controls over government personnel work product, prohibitions on the acquisition of covered defense telecommunications equipment, and whistleblower rights communication requirements. The awardee, identified by CAGE code 64249, is subject to postaward small business representation clauses and is required to comply with employment eligibility verification, anti-trafficking in persons, and sustainable products standards. No specific evaluation factors, weights, or contract type (e.g., FFP) were explicitly stated, though procurement context suggests an LPTA methodology was applied. The contract