C--Geotechnical Engineering Services at Various Activities Located Within Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic Geographic Area of Responsibility

The contract, identified by solicitation number N6247022D0003, is an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) agreement issued by Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Atlantic (NAVFAC ATLANTIC) under the Department of the Navy, with its office located in Norfolk, Virginia. It provides for geotechnical and airfield engineering services across NAVFAC Atlantic’s geographic area of responsibility, including critical infrastructure projects such as runway and taxiway repairs at locations like Barksdale Air Force Base, Naval Air Station Oceana, and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. The contract’s scope supports mission-critical aviation operations through design, inspection, and post-construction support, with a performance period extending to June 15, 2027. The initial Not-To-Exceed (NTE) value of $10 million was increased to $26 million to accommodate urgent and expanding requirements, authorized under the statutory authority of 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(2) and justified under FAR 6.302-2 due to unusual and compelling urgency, which precluded full and open competition. The contracting officer, acting on behalf of NAVFAC SYSCOM Atlantic, determined that the urgency of operational needs and the contractor’s existing familiarity with the work rendered a sole-source award appropriate. While cost reasonableness was analyzed per FAR 15.404-1 and a burn rate of 0.8 indicates accelerated spending, no formal evaluation factors, adjectival ratings, or basis of award methodology such as LPTA or trade-off were detailed. The point of contact is Kimberly Hall, and while the place of performance is at various military installations, no specific payment office, COR, COTR, invoicing method, or accounting codes (TAS, ACRN) were provided. No packaging, marking, inspection criteria, or technical specifications beyond compliance with DoD and NAVFAC standards were documented, and no offeror representations, certifications, or CAGE/UEI data were included, consistent with the non-competitive nature of the procurement.