CAP, ELECTRICAL

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Technical Services Laboratory, Inc. a contract priced at $5,310.00 for the procurement of 18 electrical caps identified by NSN 5999016842937 under solicitation SPE7M5-26-T-011A, with an award date of July 13, 2026. Performance is due 259 days after order, with delivery required to the destination at 25600 S Chrisman Road, REC WHSE 57, Tracy, CA 95304-5000, and acceptance conducted by the Government at the same location under FOB DESTINATION terms. The contract includes adherence to MIL-STD-2073-1E for packaging and MIL-STD-129 for marking and barcoding, with UCC-128-compliant labeling required for logistics tracking, while preservation standards specify Method 41, Cleaning/Drying Code 1, and no specified preservation or wrapping materials. Hazardous materials must be labeled in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, and radioactive materials exceeding thresholds must be clearly marked per MIL-STD-129. The contractor must comply with SAE AS9003 for quality assurance and the Government retains responsibility for final inspection and acceptance. The contract incorporates a comprehensive set of Federal Acquisition Regulation and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement clauses governing cybersecurity, labor compliance, and supply chain integrity, including mandatory compliance with NIST SP 800-171, as enforced by clause 252.204-7020, and the requirement to safeguard covered defense information under 252.204-7012, with reporting obligations through the Supplier Performance Risk System. Provisions for employment eligibility verification, combating human trafficking, equal opportunity for workers with disabilities, and sustainable procurement are also included. The contractor must affirm its small business status if applicable and provide Unique Entity ID and CAGE code disclosures, particularly if supplying covered defense telecommunications equipment. Invoicing is required exclusively through Wide Area WorkFlow, and payment processing utilizes DoDAAC identifiers. The solicitation did not include explicit evaluation factors, weights, or a formally stated basis of award, but procurement context suggests an automated, simplified acquisition likely using a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology with HUBZone price evaluation preferences applied. No formal Statement