CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMB

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded contract SPE7M525P5660 to WESTSIM ENGINEERING, INC. (CAGE 7MR60) on July 13, 2026, for the procurement of a single circuit card assembly identified by NSN 5998016292177, with a total contract value of $31,014.00. The solicitation number is SPE7M5-25-Q-0835, and the acquisition falls under the NAICS code 334418 for electronic component manufacturing, indicating a commercial item procurement governed by FAR 13.302(a) and FAR 12.303(a). The contract was issued through a modification to an existing agreement, with the effective date of the modification aligning with the award date. The contractor’s place of performance is listed as Orlando, Florida, while administrative oversight is handled by DLA Land and Maritime at their Columbus, Ohio office. The contract includes the FAR clause 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, under deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, effective April 2026, which imposes compliance obligations related to diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. No other special contract requirements, such as security clearances, key personnel designations, option clauses, or organizational conflict of interest provisions, are specified. Packaging and marking requirements follow standard Department of Defense conventions, with required labeling including the NSN 7540-01-152-8070 and the CAGE code 7MR60, though specific packaging standards like MIL-STD-2073 or marking standards like MIL-STD-129 are not explicitly cited. Inspection and acceptance responsibilities lie with the Government, though the exact location for inspection or acceptance is not defined. No delivery schedule, FOB terms, quantities, or unit pricing details are provided beyond the single line item and total value. Payment processing is managed by the DLA Land and Maritime office in Columbus, Ohio, with no specific invoicing system identified, although electronic submissions are expected via DIBBS. No Contracting Officer’s Representative or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative is named, and the award basis, evaluation factors, socioeconomic certifications, or affirmative representations from the offeror are not documented. The contract does