Circuit Card Assembly

This solicitation, identified as SPRHA4-26-Q-0391, was canceled on May 1, 2026, and fully replaced by SPRHA4-26-R-0391, rendering all associated requirements obsolete. The original solicitation sought one each of two specific circuit card assemblies identified by NSN 5998-01-548-4190 and NSN 5998-01-548-4187, with performance restricted exclusively to approved sources: Lockheed Martin (CAGE 81755) and Raytheon (CAGE 96214). The contracting activity was administered by the Utah Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Ogden, based at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. The place of performance was designated as Hill Air Force Base, though no delivery schedule, period of performance, or contract value was specified. All packaging, preservation, and marking of the items were governed by stringent military standards, primarily MIL-STD-2073-1 for packaging, MIL-STD-129 for labeling and barcoding, and MIL-HDBK-773 and ANSI/ESD S20.20 for electrostatic discharge protection. Hazardous material handling required compliance with DOT 49 CFR, IATA, IMDG, and ICAO regulations, along with Competent Authority Approval for certified packaging. Wood packaging for international shipments had to meet ISPM-15 standards. Contractors were required to use Special Packaging Instructions via SPIRES, submit Safety Data Sheets per FED-STD-313, and report discrepancies through WebSDR. Documentation was further guided by AFMC Form 158 and AFMC124-201 for Item Type Storage Codes. While inspection and acceptance were to occur at both origin and destination points under government authority, no evaluation factors, award basis, pricing, contract type, or financing details were provided. No representations, certifications, or socioeconomic information from potential offerors were included, and no Contracting Officer’s Representative, technical representative, or procuring contracting officer was named, though administrative contact information for Stephine Lucero was listed. The submission deadline listed in the metadata predates the posting date, indicating a potential administrative error. The solicitation’s technical scope was well-defined but entirely superseded by its replacement.