CONTAINER, DESICCATO

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a firm-fixed-price contract to SEAHORSE DEFENSE SUPPLY, LLC (CAGE 7AV65) for the procurement of one Desiccator Container (NSN 6630123618517) under solicitation SPE2DH-26-T-5364, with a total contract value of $207.00 and an award date of July 27, 2026. The item is destined for delivery to USS CHARLESTON LCS 18, Unit 100474 Box 1, FPO AP 96694, with delivery required within five days after the date of order under FOB Destination terms, meaning the contractor bears all transportation costs and risks until arrival at the final destination. The contract is classified under NAICS code 423450 and issued under the Department of Defense with no set-aside designation, though socioeconomic representations are mandatory and must be accurately verified through SAM.gov. The contractor must comply with extensive packaging and labeling standards, including MIL-STD-129 for all shipping containers, RP001 for DLA-specific packaging and palletization, and ASTM D3951 where not superseded. Hazardous materials require adherence to 29 CFR 1910.1200 labeling, and any radioactive content necessitates advance notification with technical details to the Contracting Officer. Safety Data Sheets must be submitted prior to award for all hazardous substances, and failure to comply may render the offeror nonresponsible. The contract incorporates multiple FAR and DFARS clauses addressing equal opportunity, trafficking in persons, employment eligibility verification, cybersecurity safeguards, subcontracts, inspection, default, and prohibitions on covered defense telecommunications equipment. All invoicing must be processed through WAWF, and the contractor is responsible for proper barcoding using 2D Data Matrix standards. The Contracting Officer must still finalize key details such as the specific contract type and safety notification periods. The contract includes no option quantities, extended terms, or modification authorities beyond the single item, with the award based on price and technical acceptability likely under a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology.