CONTRACTOR FIRST ARTICLE TEST

The contract SPE4A626P6319, awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency to HYRIZE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, LLC with CAGE code 8SKT8 on July 16, 2026, encompasses contractor-led first article testing and the procurement of a wiring harness identified by NSN 6150-01-450-6923. Although the original line item for 28 units at $425 each carried a total value of $11,900, this specific line was fully canceled under Modification P00001, resulting in a net contract value of $0 with no further financial obligation to the Government. The contract is administratively managed under simplified acquisition procedures per FAR 13.004(c), with performance expected to meet general defense logistics standards, though no explicit technical specifications, quality standards, or inspection criteria such as MIL-STD or AS9102 are detailed in the provided documentation. The contractor’s principal location is in Chatsworth, California, with government oversight administered by DCMA Southern California in Carson, California, where acceptance of any deliverables is likely to occur, though no formal place of delivery or FOB terms are stated. The contracting officer, Larry Conner, issued the award and subsequent cancellation, with Corinne Brazeal serving as a point of contact, though without explicit designation as a COR or COTR. There are no identified FAR clauses, special contract requirements, or attachments listed within the provided materials, and no socioeconomic certifications, affirmative representations beyond the CAGE code, or funding data such as TAS or ACRN lines are present. The NAICS code 541380 reflects professional testing and laboratory services, consistent with the nature of the first article test requirement, yet the contract lacks formal pricing structure, delivery schedules, option quantities, or performance period definitions beyond the award date. Payment methods, invoicing platforms, packaging directives, and applicable MIL-STDs are not specified, suggesting these elements are either covered in external technical data packages or were omitted from the provided excerpts. The contract’s structure is minimal, primarily serving as an administrative instrument to formalize cancellation of a previously planned procurement, with no active obligations remaining.