CUP-S-2025-0009

The project under Administrative Action CUP-S-2025-0009 involves modifications to a previously approved 209,524-square-foot warehouse development located at 903 Quimisa Drive in Simi Valley, California. The primary changes include reconfiguring the building’s shape and design to support multi-tenant warehouse and office use, reducing the total parking capacity from 206 to 200 spaces, increasing the number of loading docks from 24 to 33, and slightly expanding landscaping area from 69,748 to 70,192 square feet. The revised building will contain 193,187 square feet of warehouse space, 7,200 square feet of office space, and a 9,137-square-foot mezzanine, maintaining the same overall floor area as originally approved. All new grading activities are designed to remain within previously permitted boundaries to avoid encroachment on Alamos Creek along the eastern edge of the site. The project has undergone environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, resulting in a Mitigated Negative Declaration, with compliance obligations tied to permits from the State Water Resources Control Board and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, including adherence to stormwater controls, tree preservation, and lighting restrictions to mitigate ecological impacts. The applicant, Curtis Quillin, is seeking approval from the City of Simi Valley as the lead agency for this administrative modification, which builds upon a prior approval identified as CUP-S-2022-0014. While the project is classified internally as a forecast and posted on December 15, 2025, it is not governed by federal procurement regulations, and no standard FAR clauses, contract types, pricing, payment terms, or acquisition data are applicable or included in the documentation. The city’s Department of Environmental Services oversees compliance, with the applicant responsible for implementing environmental mitigation measures such as habitat protection and stormwater management under SWRCB General Permit WDID 456C315159. Although the site is largely graded and construction is imminent, there is no defined period of performance, invoicing mechanism, or contract administration personnel designated in the materials. The focus of the documentation remains exclusively on regulatory compliance and environmental safeguards rather than procurement or contractual obligations, with all references to “I-” numbered items pertaining to CEQA mitigation actions, not contractual clauses. There are no identified socioeconomic certifications, UEI or