CUP, TAPERED ROLLER BEARING

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A626PH534 to Jamaica Bearings Co., Inc. (CAGE 04836) on July 21, 2026, for the procurement of a single item: a CUP, TAPERED ROLLER BEARING identified by National Stock Number 3110-01-398-0171, with a total contract value of $27,700.00. The solicitation, SPE4A6-26-T-515J, was issued under NAICS code 332991 for Other Bearing Manufacturing, and the award reflects a low-value, single-line-item transaction with no option quantities or extended pricing clauses. Performance is expected to occur at the contractor’s facility in New Hyde Park, NY, with no alternate delivery location specified, and the contract incorporates the FAR clause 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, as modified by DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, which imposes requirements to prohibit racially discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion practices and mandates flow-down obligations to subcontractors. The contractor must report any known violations by subcontractors and is subject to contract termination or debarment for noncompliance. Packaging and marking must adhere to standard Defense Logistics Agency and Department of Defense practices, including compliance with MIL-STD-129 for labeling with the NSN and CAGE code, and MIL-STD-2073-1 for military packaging, though specific details are not explicitly defined in the contract documents. Bar-coding is implied through standard DLA logistics requirements but not formally specified. The placing of performance is within the United States, and while no formal period of performance, FOB terms, or delivery schedule is stated, the contract’s effective date is March 4, 2026, with modification P00001 issued on the award date. The payment office is DLA Aviation, ASC Commodities Division in Richmond, VA, with Carl Allen listed as the Contracting Officer; however, no Contracting Officer’s Representative or Technical Representative is designated, and invoicing procedures, accounting codes (AAC, TAS, ACRN), and inspection or acceptance criteria are not specified. The award was likely made under a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology, given the straightforward nature of the requirement and absence of