CYLINDER ASSEMBLY, A

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPE4A726P3333 to MAVEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, located in Anaheim, California, for a total price of $97,196.35, with an award date of July 17, 2026. The contract encompasses the procurement of Cylinder Assembly, A (NSN 1650016585492) and a Government First Article Test to validate conformance before full-scale production. The work is administered by DLA Aviation’s ASC Supplier Operations OEM Division, with the Contracting Officer listed as Dean Allen, though no Contracting Officer’s Representative or technical oversight personnel are identified. The contract is structured as a modification of an existing agreement, designated as P00001, and appears to be a Firm-Fixed-Price arrangement based on the fixed total amount and defined deliverables, though the type is not formally stated. Performance and delivery locations are unspecified, though the contractor’s location and administering office suggest potential delivery within the United States, likely to a government facility in Carson, California. The contract includes the mandatory FAR 52.222-90 clause on Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, implemented under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040 Revision 1, which requires the contractor to refrain from racially discriminatory DEI practices, flow the clause down to all subcontracts, report known subcontractor violations or legal challenges to the Contracting Officer, and provide access to records upon request. No other specific technical, packaging, marking, or preservation standards—such as MIL-STD-129, MIL-STD-2073, or MIL-STD-130—are detailed in the available documentation, indicating compliance may be governed by separate exhibits or referenced documents not provided. Invoicing methods, payment offices, and accounting data including AAC, TAS, or ACRN lines are not specified, and no delivery schedule, FOB terms, or quantity details are provided for the line items. The contractor’s size status and socioeconomic certifications are not stated, and no evaluation factors or award rationale are documented, leaving the basis of selection—whether LPTA or trade-off—unconfirmed. Inspection and acceptance responsibilities are governed by the clause’s general obligations, with the contractor expected to ensure compliance while the government retains final authority for acceptance.