DETECTOR, GAS

The contract solicitation SPE7M1-26-T-028L issued by the Defense Logistics Agency under the Maritime Supply Chain organization seeks 20 gas detectors with NSN 6665-01-627-8701, to be delivered to Fort Stewart, Georgia within 20 days after award, under FOB Origin terms. The procurement is governed by stringent packaging and marking requirements aligned with MIL-STD-2073-1E and MIL-STD-129, including controlled dry storage per Preservation Method 41, and mandates full compliance with OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) for hazardous materials labeling, including pictograms, signal words, and hazard statements, with non-exempt hazard labels required for submission prior to award. The item is subject to a 12-month non-extendable shelf life under RS001, and all containers must include standardized barcode labeling using Data Matrix per MIL-STD-129 for DoD supply chain traceability. Cybersecurity compliance is a critical component, requiring adherence to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1 for safeguarding covered defense information, with contractors obligated to complete a Self-Assessment, submit a System Security Plan to SPRS, and allow government access for assessments under DFARS clause 252.204-7020. All offerors must provide a valid UEI and CAGE code, disclose any involvement in covered defense telecommunications equipment per DFARS 252.204-7017 and 7018, and certify their small business or socioeconomic status through SAM.gov. The contract mandates electronic invoicing via WAWF and specifies that inspection and acceptance occur at the destination against technical and quality standards documented in RD004 and RA001. Clause inclusion under FAR and DFARS enforces compliance with equal opportunity, combating trafficking, employment eligibility verification, whistleblower rights, and information safeguarding, with deviations permitted under 2026-00038. While contract type, pricing extent, and evaluation factors are not explicitly defined, the presence of technical compliance thresholds and cybersecurity scoring suggests a trade-off award process rather than LPTA, with the final award contingent on successful fulfillment of all technical, regulatory, and cybersecurity obligations.