Dover Air Force Base Dormitory
Contract Overview
Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.
AI Contract Overview
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, is seeking industry input for the planned construction of a 245-room dormitory at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, with an estimated project cost between $100 million and $150 million. The facility will be a permanent, steel-frame structure with reinforced concrete foundations and slabs, featuring 8-inch interior and 12-inch exterior masonry walls, a sloped metal roof, and full site utilities, pavements, and security enhancements. It will include Enhanced 1+1 room configurations with private bathrooms, living modules, laundry, vending, storage, administrative, and recreational spaces, fully compliant with the Air Force Enlisted Unaccompanied Housing Guidance Memo of July 2018 and all applicable Department of Defense Unified Facilities Criteria, including anti-terrorism and force protection standards under UFC 4-010-01. The project is classified under NAICS code 236220 and will require adherence to seismic design codes and permanent construction standards. This solicitation is a sources sought notice and industry day event, not a competitive bid opportunity, and responses are requested to inform future acquisition planning. Industry respondents are invited to participate in an industry day on August 18–19, 2026, at The Landings Club in Dover, Delaware, with priority given to high-priority questions covering project delivery methods, early contractor involvement, local subcontractor availability, and the use of alternative and industrialized construction techniques such as modular or panelized systems. Submitters must provide their business size classification, demonstrated experience with comparable projects, and detailed past performance on no more than three recent projects of similar scope and value, including contract amounts and government contacts. Responses are limited to ten pages and must be submitted by August 17, 2026, at 2:00 PM EST to Brian W. Cox. The government seeks insights into design and construction challenges including adherence to UFC and UFGS standards, site tolerances, differential settlement mitigation, HVAC lifecycle performance, labor and material constraints in the region, and how to reduce overspecification to improve cost efficiency. No feedback or evaluation will be provided on submissions, and telephone inquiries are not accepted.
General Info
Agency
NAICS
Place of Performance
Dover AFB, DE, 19902, USASet-Aside
Documents
(0)AI Contract Breakdown
Uniform Contract FormatNo contract breakdown available.
Cannot generate Contract Breakdown because no documents were found from this contract's source.
Timeline
Response Deadline
Organization & Contact Information
Full Description
Description of Work: This is a SOURCES SOUGHT NOTICE/INDUSTRY DAY and is for information purposes only.
THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, QUOTATIONS, OR BIDS.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, intends to award a firm fixed price contract for Dover Air Force Base Dormitory, Dover, DE.
Contract work consists of:
Construct a 245-room dormitory consisting of a multi-level steel frame structure with reinforced concrete foundation and floor slabs, interior corridors, masonry walls/finish system with 8-inch interior walls and 12-inch exterior walls, sloped metal roof, pavements, utilities, and other necessary support. The dormitory space shall include Enhanced 1+1 room configurations with a private bathroom, living modules and laundry, vending, storage, administrative, recreation, and supporting facilities in accordance with the Air Force Enlisted Unaccompanied Housing Guidance Memo, 25 July 2018. The project includes all utilities, site improvements, pavements, detection/protection features, security enhancements, and other supporting work necessary to provide a complete and useable facility. The facility must be able to withstand seismic effects as prescribed in applicable codes and design guides. Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with Department of Defense Unified Facilities Criteria 1-200-01. This project will comply with Department of Defense anti-terrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-010-01.
Estimated cost range of the project is $100M-$150M.
The NAICS Code for this project is 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction.
INDUSTRY DAY Location
The Landings Club. -479 Evreux St, Dover, DE 19902
Date: 18-19 August 2026
18 August 2026 for the Industry day/ 1-on-1
19 August 2026 for additional 1-on-1 capability briefings
POINT OF CONTACT
Project Manager: CPT Ramon F. Concepcion/ Ramon.F.Conception@usace.army.mil
Design Manager: Christopher P. Carnes/ Christopher.P.Carnes@usace.army.mil
Sources Sought/Market Survey responses Requested to this Sources Sought Announcement/INDUSTRY DAY will be used by the Government to make appropriate acquisition decisions. Narratives are requested with the following information, which shall not exceed a total of ten (10) pages Interested Offerors can respond to this Sources Sought Synopsis to include the following information:
- Offeror’s name, address, points of contact with telephone numbers and e-mail addresses.
- Business size/classification to include any designations as Small Business, HUBZone, Service-Disabled Veteran Owned, 8(a), Women-Owned small businesses shall be indicated on first page of submission.
- Description of capability to perform similar or same projects listed above and manage subcontractors if applicable.
Past performance/experience on projects of similar scope and magnitude, describing no more than three (3) projects completed within the past five years. The past performance information should include project title, location, general description of the construction to demonstrate relevance to the proposed projects, the Offeror’s role, dollar value of contract, and name of the company, agency or government entity for which the work was performed with contact information (reference name, phone number and e-mail address).
DAFB Dormitory – Questions for an Industry Day
Please emphasize answering High Priority Questions (1-11) over Low Priority Questions (12-29).
High Priority Questions
- What alternative project delivery methods (e.g., design‑build, CM‑at‑risk, progressive design‑build) would you recommend to compress schedule and reduce change orders, and why? (USACE)
- What early contractor involvement or preconstruction services would most help to optimize cost, phasing, and constructability before the design is finalized? (USACE)
- Do you feel that the local sub-contractor pool availability will be a constraint in the execution of this project? (USACE)
- What are your thoughts on Alternative Construction Methods? (A-E)
- What alternative construction methods (including industrialized construction) have you previously applied to projects? (A-E)
- What was the project impact of these methods, specifically to: (A-E)
- Schedule
- Cost
- Quality
- What are challenges associated with these methods? (A-E)
- Design – changes to current UFC and UFGS standards?
- Construction – Availability of contractors, availability of materials, Cost, transportation?
- What are the benefits associated with these methods? (A-E)
- What alternate construction method(s) do you recommend (linear/panelized, modular, etc ) for THIS project and why? (USACE)
- Is there anything you would like the government to know? (A-E)
- What constraints should be considered to ensure industrialized construction solutions can be prefabricated, transported, and erected for the area this project will be constructed? (USACE)
Low Priority Questions
- How much staging area would be needed if some type of industrialized construction were used? (USACE)
- How much lead time would be required for procurement of prefabricated units? (USACE)
- Where would industrialized construction components be sourced from? (USACE)
- Can the modules be engineered to meet Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) standards? (USACE)
- How do your standard designs adapt to meet Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)? (USACE)
- What structural tolerances (vertical and horizontal) does your system require for the site-built foundation (e.g., pier, slab-on-grade ... etc.)? And does it require standard tolerances or more stringent tolerances? (USACE)
- How are the structural connections between the modules and the foundation made, and are they accessible for inspection and future maintenance? (USACE)
- How do you control and mitigate differential settlement between modules, especially on soils with low bearing capacity? What experience do you have installing vapor barriers and/or passive or active vapor removal systems? Is the experience internal or through a subcontractor? (USACE)
- Are you aware of USACE ECB 2026-13 Reformed Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) and Modernized Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG)? The primary goal of the UFC Reform was to more closely align DoD requirements with the International Building Code (IBC) and other recognized industry standards. The initiative rigorously challenged the extra criteria previously mandated for DoD facilities, focusing on designing to mission requirements and reducing the overall cost of military construction. How will this impact bidding and risk on the project? (USACE)
- From your experience, where does overspecification typically occur in dormitory projects (structural loading, fireproofing, finishes, etc), and what could be used instead to be more cost and schedule efficient? Which specifications or details commonly drive unnecessary cost (custom elements, proprietary systems, overly tight tolerances), and how might they be rewritten to allow cost‑effective equivalent products or methods? (USACE)
- What HVAC building systems tend to provide the best lifecycle cost and maintainability for dormitories the climate the project is being constructed? (USACE)
- What are typical schedule delays you see on similar projects (e.g., utility coordination, material lead times, inspections), and what design or contracting strategies have best mitigated them? (USACE)
- What long‑lead materials or equipment should the project be designed around to protect the critical path, and what alternatives can be considered to reduce risk of losing schedule? (USACE)
- Which details typically generate RFIs and field rework on dormitory projects, and how can the drawings and specifications be clarified to minimize ambiguities? (USACE)
- What contractual or commercial barriers typically prevent you from proposing bold ideas or meeting contract requirements, and how can this project avoid them? (USACE)
- Can you share examples where you significantly reduced cost or schedule on a similar building through unconventional means, and what design conditions made those successes possible? (USACE)
- Given the current local labor and subcontractor market, how should the design be tailored to align with the strengths and limitations of available trades? (USACE)
- Are there particular systems or materials that are difficult to staff or supply locally that we should avoid or redesign around? (USACE)
Telephone inquiries will not be accepted or acknowledged, and no feedback or evaluations will be provided to companies regarding their submissions. If you have any questions concerning this opportunity, please contact: Responses should be sent to Brian W. Cox@usace.army.mil on or before 17 August 2026, at 2:00 PM EST.
Similar Contracts
Same NAICS industry code
More opportunities from Department Of Defense → W2SD Endist Philadelphia
Same awarding agency