EPOXY COATING KIT

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE8ES24D0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS (CAGE 79343) for the procurement of two units of an EPOXY COATING KIT (NSN 8010014322616), totaling $482.46, with an award date of July 16, 2026, and a required delivery date of July 30, 2026. The item is to be shipped FOB destination to USS RAMAGE (DDG 61), FPO AE 09586, with the contractor responsible for all transportation costs and required to use the fastest traceable means, explicitly prohibiting parcel post. The acquisition is classified as a small business, disadvantaged women-owned enterprise, and follows simplified acquisition procedures under a Low Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) methodology, reflecting the minimal complexity and low value of the order. The delivery order is administered by DLA Troop Support Construction & Equipment, with Nate Prattico serving as the sole contracting officer and point of contact. Payment will be processed electronically via EDI to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, under accounting code BX 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189 and payment code SL4701. The contract includes strict labeling requirements, mandating that all packages and documentation bear the base contract number SPE8ES-24-D-0005 and the delivery order number SPE8ES-26-F-622M, though no specific barcoding or military packaging standards like MIL-STD-129 are cited. Inspection and acceptance occur solely at the destination by an authorized government representative, with compliance dependent on the item meeting contract specifications as outlined in the underlying basic contract. The seller’s representation as a small disadvantaged women-owned business triggers ongoing reporting obligations under FAR 52.219-28 and SAM.gov requirements. The order is designated as a DPAS-rated priority under 15 CFR 700, elevating its fulfillment above non-priority activities within the defense supply chain, while no option periods, quantity flexibility, or additional clauses are present. No formal evaluation factors, inspection criteria beyond general conformity, or technical specifications beyond the NSN are provided, consistent with its classification as a straightforward