EPOXY PRIMER COATIN

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under basic contract SPE8ES24D0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC, with a CAGE code of 79343, for the supply of 1.000 kilogram of EPOXY PRIMER COATING (NSN 8010014670160) at a total price of $47.51. The award was issued as a firm-fixed-price delivery order, identified by solicitation number SPE8ES26F54XF, with an award date of July 5, 2026, and a required delivery date of July 20, 2026. The item must be delivered FOB destination to USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN 73), located at FPO AP 96607, with inspection and acceptance conducted by the government upon arrival. All packaging and labeling must reference the primary contract number SPE8ES24D0005 and the delivery order number SPE8ES26F54XF, in compliance with DLA administrative procedures, particularly DLAD PROC NOTE C19 and C20, though no specific MIL-STD packaging or marking standards are explicitly cited. Payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using the accounting code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189, and invoicing is expected through electronic data interchange systems. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC, is certified as a small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned business, triggering applicable federal reporting obligations under FAR and DFARS. The contracting officer and administrative point of contact is Nate Prattico, reachable via email and phone at DLA Troop Support, Construction & Equipment. No contract clauses from Section I, special requirements from Section H, evaluation factors from Section M, or formal attachment listings from Section J were included in the documentation, indicating the transaction is streamlined due to its minimal dollar value and routine nature. The award appears consistent with a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology, relying on the basic contract’s terms and conditions for governing requirements. No options, subcontracting plans, or quality specifications beyond conformance to the contract are detailed, and the absence of a contracting officer signature does not preclude award validity under DLA’s electronic