FY26 Design Build / Design Bid Build General Construction East Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC)

The FY26 Design Build / Design Bid Build General Construction East Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC), managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District (W074 Endist Charleston), is a firm-fixed-price indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract focused on providing general construction services across a geographic region encompassing all states east of the Mississippi River and including Puerto Rico. This contract is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS code 236220, aimed at supporting various Department of Defense and associated mission-critical construction, maintenance, and renovation projects using both Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build delivery methodologies. The contract has a five-year potential period of performance, with a three-year base and a two-year option, and task orders are competitively solicited within the awardees’ pool, with individual task order values generally not exceeding $1,000,000. The primary beneficiaries include Defense Logistics Agency, Medical Facilities of Rhode Island, the 81st Regional Support Command, Joint Base Charleston, and Fort Jackson, among others. The acquisition strategy emphasizes reducing schedule and performance risks, with the award basis inferred to be a trade-off process prioritizing mission-critical schedule efficiency and risk mitigation over cost competition. While no formal FAR contract clauses were explicitly identified, the procurement aligns with FAR Part 16 for indefinite-delivery contracts and FAR 7.107 for consolidation justifications. The contract structure promotes rapid acquisition cycles, aiming to deliver task orders within approximately 60-80 days, enhancing operational continuity and supporting timely mission execution. Inspection and acceptance take place at project sites, overseen by government representatives consistent with USACE quality control processes, although no detailed technical standards or specialized contract requirements like security clearances or key personnel provisions were documented. Payment, invoicing, and precise contract value data were not specified, reflecting the document’s focus on procurement rationale and structure rather than full contract execution details. The solicitation process engaged primarily small business firms, including 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, and WOSB types, and requires conformance with small business reporting and coordination protocols per applicable regulatory statutes.