GOVERNMENT FIRST ARTICLE TEST

The contract SPE4A726P5883, awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency to LCF SYSTEMS, INC. on July 21, 2026, has a total value of $58,760.25 and stems from solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-6160. The contract includes two line items: a Government First Article Test and a Bayonet, Oxygen Mask, indicating delivery and testing of military equipment. Performance is to occur at the contractor’s location in Scottsdale, Arizona, with all activities confined within the United States. The award was made under a modification (P00001) to an existing contract, with the effective date of modification being January 26, 2026, though the overall period of performance is not explicitly defined. The contract is administered by DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia, and overseen by DCMA Mountain Pacific in Lakewood, Colorado, with the Procuring Contracting Officer identified as Dean Allen, while no Contracting Officer’s Representative is listed. The contract type is not formally stated but appears consistent with a small-dollar fixed-price award based on total value and scope. The only clause explicitly incorporated into this contract is FAR 52.222-90, Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, implemented under a DoD class deviation (2026-00040). This clause requires the contractor to refrain from discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or veteran status, to flow the clause down to subcontracts above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, to report any violations or legal challenges from subcontractors, and to provide records upon request. Compliance with this clause is deemed material to payment under 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(4). No other clauses, inspection standards, packaging requirements, invoicing procedures, or accounting data such as AAC, TAS, or ACRN are specified. The contractor’s size status or socioeconomic certifications are not declared, and no Unique Entity ID is provided. Evaluation factors, FOB terms, delivery schedules, quality standards, or detailed pricing structures are absent from the documentation, with the award decision methodology left unexplained. No attachments are listed, and no formal Section C, E, H, M, or J contents are present beyond the referenced DEI clause and administrative details.