Graeagle CAPM

The project involves rehabilitation of State Route 89 near Graeagle, extending from the Sierra County line to Route 70 in Plumas County, California, with the goal of extending the highway’s service life, improving ride quality, restoring culvert integrity, reducing long-term maintenance needs, and enhancing safety and accessibility for bicycles and pedestrians. Work includes edge-to-edge pavement overlay, reconstruction of permitted road connections within the existing right-of-way, replacement and upgrading of guardrails, signage, delineators, drainage systems, shoulder backing, and pavement markings to meet current Caltrans standards. The project is designated as a forecast with no published solicitation or contract number, and no financial value or pricing details are provided. The California Department of Transportation, District 2 – Redding, is the procuring agency, with Keith Pelfrey, Senior Environmental Scientist, listed as the primary point of contact. Environmental compliance is established through categorical exemptions under the California Public Resources Code, specifically referencing Section 15301 for existing facilities, which exempts the project from further environmental review under CEQA. No formal FAR clauses, contract administration data such as a COR or COTR designation, invoicing procedures, payment office details, accounting codes, or evaluation factors for award are specified in the documentation. Performance is to occur entirely on-site along the designated corridor, with inspection and acceptance handled by Caltrans. There are no packaging, preservation, or labeling requirements as typically defined in logistics or procurement contexts; all references to marking relate exclusively to roadway surface and traffic control features. No delivery schedule, FOB terms, or contract type classification (e.g., FFP, IDIQ) are provided, and no special requirements such as key personnel, contract options, or organizational conflict of interest provisions are included. Offeror representations, certifications, size status, socioeconomic categorizations, and UEI or CAGE codes are not documented, indicating this is a preliminary forecast and not a formal solicitation. Submissions for environmental documentation must be mailed to the Office of Planning and Research in Sacramento, though no deadline or electronic submission portal is stated.