Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, November 11 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Sources Sought opportunity was posted on July 30, 2015. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

Awarded
SDT755821Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541720
New
Federal
Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) Updates
Solicitation # 693JJ926R000067
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is soliciting proposals for a single-award, Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) completion contract to update the Countermeasures That Work (CMTW) evidence-based reference guide and its companion document, Countermeasures At Work (CMAW). The project involves developing the 13th and 14th editions of CMTW and the 2nd edition of CMAW, as well as updating the Electronic Countermeasures That Work (E-CMTW) website. The selected contractor will conduct comprehensive literature searches and synthesize research across eleven behavioral traffic safety program areas, updating approximately three to four chapters annually. The contract period consists of a twelve-month base period with four twelve-month options, for a total potential duration of sixty months. Award will be based on best value, with a primary emphasis on superior technical skills over the lowest cost. Evaluation factors include the offeror's understanding of research complexities, the soundness of the proposed approach, personnel qualifications, and corporate past performance. Deliverables must adhere to strict quality control standards, including the use of APA 7th edition style and rigorous anti-plagiarism compliance. All final text must be submitted in electronic format using minimal formatting to facilitate government printing. Proposals must be submitted in two separate volumes, technical and business, by November 5, 2026.
693JJ9 Nhtsa Office Of Acquistion

POSTED

about 23 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 7 days
NAICS: 541720
New
SLED
ARFQ-0402-EDD2700000004-2 | Statewide Evaluation for the 21st CCLC Program
Solicitation # ARFQ-0402-EDD2700000004-2
The West Virginia Department of Education is seeking a statewide evaluator for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program, authorized under Title IV, Part B of the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The selected contractor will be responsible for collecting, validating, and analyzing evaluation data, which includes conducting at least one annual on-site visit to five selected subgrantees and delivering one in-person presentation of findings in Charleston, West Virginia, each contract year. Services are anticipated to begin in January 2027, with a Statewide Evaluation Plan due within 60 calendar days of the effective start date. This fixed-amount agency contract will be awarded to the vendor that meets all minimum qualifications and mandatory requirements for the lowest overall total cost, calculated as the sum of the initial contract year and three optional renewal years. Deliverables must be provided in accessible formats, including Microsoft Word, searchable PDFs, and nonproprietary machine-readable datasets. Due to the nature of the work, the contractor must adhere to strict data privacy standards, including FERPA compliance and the execution of confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements. Bids must be submitted electronically via wvOASIS or delivered to the agency by November 12, 2026, at 10:30 AM EDT.
West Virginia

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 14 days
NAICS: 541720
New
SLED
Program Evaluation Services for the Local Community Benefits Fund
Solicitation # 2026-040
Solicitation 2026-040, issued by the Community Investments Office of the Air District, seeks a contractor to provide program evaluation services for 28 Round 1 grantees of the Local Community Benefits Fund. The project is designed to support the Air District's mission of improving air quality, reducing environmental inequities, and mitigating climate change across nine Bay Area counties. The contract has an established budget of 1,500,000 dollars and an anticipated duration of up to six years. The work is divided into two primary phases: Phase A, focusing on indicator tracking technical assistance for early grant implementation, and Phase B, which covers output tracking, analysis, and periodic program evaluation, culminating in a final synthesis of findings during years five and six. The selection process involves a two-phase evaluation consisting of a proposal review and an interview. Proposals are evaluated based on technical merit, with a preference given to local businesses headquartered within the Air District's jurisdiction. In the event of a tie in scoring, the lower cost offer will be accepted. Key requirements for respondents include a detailed technical proposal, a separate cost proposal, a disclosure regarding the use of Generative AI, and a commitment to retain project records for five years. The deadline for electronic submission via the procurement portal is November 30, 2026, at 4:00 pm Pacific Time.
Community Investments Office

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in about 1 month
NAICS: 541720
New
Federal
Continuing Human Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS)
Solicitation # FA238424S2233
The Continuing Human Enabling, Enhancing, Restoring and Sustaining (CHEERS) program is a Multiple Authority Announcement (MAA) managed by the Air Force Research Laboratory Human Effectiveness Directorate and the United States Air Force School of Medicine. The program provides a comprehensive strategy for science and technology research, progressing from basic research to technology maturation to optimize and protect Airman capabilities across Air, Space, and Cyberspace. The scope is divided into three primary areas: Airman Biosciences, which focuses on biotechnology and aerospace medicine; Bioeffects, which addresses battlefield environmental stressors; and Warfighter Interactions and Readiness, which enhances mission execution. The MAA utilizes a flexible procurement framework, employing various authorities including Broad Agency Announcements, Other Transaction agreements for research and prototypes, and grants. Awards are generally anticipated to be cost-plus-fixed-fee. The selection process typically involves a two-step approach requiring an initial five-page white paper and rough order of magnitude cost, followed by a full technical and cost proposal for selected candidates. Evaluation is prioritized by technical merit, specifically focusing on innovation, understanding of scope, technical soundness, and transition potential, with cost realism serving as a secondary factor. Recent updates include several moratoriums to preserve competition, specifically closing technical areas related to BRDEE, Information Mastery in Cognitive Warfare, and Holistic Models for Decision-Making for six-month periods following specific proposal closing dates. All contractor personnel must undergo a minimum Tier 1 background check for positions of trust, and offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management. The program maintains strict data rights and security protocols, including foreign influence due diligence and specific DFARS requirements for technical data and computer software.
Air Force Research Laboratory

POSTED

2 days ago

DEADLINE

N/A

General Info

Agency

N/A

Contract Value

$0

NAICS

541720 - Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities

Place of Performance

355 E STREET SW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20024, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Award Issued Date

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

PhaseAwarded
Posted

Sources Sought

Awarded

Contract was awarded

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Get full access to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyN/A
Contacts1 person available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
N/A
Office AddressN/A

Full Description

Show more
Statement of Work Acquisition of 2013 County-Level Social Accounting Matrix Data July 2015 Background ERS conducts research on human subjects, including the generation of primary data. All government human subjects' research is covered by the Common Rule (CR). A component of the CR requires Institutional Review Board (IRB) review for non-exempt research. Additionally, the academic profession requires IRB review for most experimental research (AER, for instance, requires with every journal submission an IRB review or a signed statement explaining why IRB clearance was not obtained). In the United States, IRBs are governed by Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46. These regulations define the rules and responsibilities for institutional review, which is required for all research that receives support, directly or indirectly, from the United States federal government. Requirement ERS seeks an AAHRPP accredited IRB to provide review of ERS studies on an as-needed basis. ERS requests proposals for IRB services from public and private IRB providers. The contractor shall have an IRB committee that performs ethical review of proposed research to help assure the protection of the rights and welfare of human participants; be able to assess whether the project is exempt and requires a less rigorous review process; whether an expedited review is possible and complete such a review; or conduct the more extensive full board review if needed. The contractor shall make available review forms, investigator training as needed for the research team, and assistance to ERS in developing the appropriate package for evaluation. They will determine if research projects follow the needed steps when working with human subjects such as informed consent and advice on needed modifications to the research proposals. Depending on the category of review, reviews may be conducted by IRB analyst and IRB manager (Exempt); IRB analyst and IRB Chair (Expedited); or the Full Board. Deliverable Following the reviews, a letter will be published and provided to ERS stating the determination and approval with any conditions attached. Payment ERS will provide funds to cover review of several research studies. The funds will be transferred as a one-time payment to pre-pay for review services, and each study review will be debited against this payment. Payment levels may vary with the complexity of the study and the timeline for review, but ERS requests that bidders provide a description of typical per-study costs in their proposal for each type of review. full text of 7 CFR 1(c) is available in PDF format from the GPO: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title7-vol1/pdf/CFR-2011-title7-vol1-part1c.pdf or in HTML format from Justia: http://law.justia.com/cfr/title07/7-1.1.1.1.4.html. Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs. Statement of Work Acquisition of 2013 County-Level Social Accounting Matrix Data June 2015 NAICS CODE 541720 Please contact Shelia Tucker via email at contact@example.gov

Earlier notices in this NAICS code

Posted before this notice, open and closed

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS