Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Government Contract opportunity from Department Of Defense was posted on March 5, 2021. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

Joint All Domain Operations (JADO) MQ-1C Gray Eagle Payloads

Closed
W56KGY-21-R-JADO2Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 334511
New
Federal
Egyptian Navy Autonomous INTelligence System (AINTS) Platform Integration
Solicitation # N0003926RE014
The Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWAR) is soliciting proposals under RFP N0003926RE014 for the Egyptian Navy Autonomous Intelligence Systems (AINTS) Platform Integration. This Foreign Military Sales effort supports the PEO C4I International Integration Program Office (PMW 740) and involves the design, engineering, procurement, integration, testing, installation, and training for AINTS capabilities. The scope of work includes the delivery of specialized hardware such as Electronic Support Measures (ESM) and Communications Intelligence (COMINT) equipment, Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs), and spare parts, alongside technical assistance and Field Service Representative (FSR) support. The contract is estimated for award between June 2027 and June 2030 with a three-year period of performance. The acquisition utilizes a hybrid pricing structure consisting of Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) for labor, Cost-Reimbursement for travel and other direct costs, and Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) for materials and equipment. Award will be based on best value, with non-cost factors weighted as significantly more important than cost. Proposals must be submitted in three volumes via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) portal. Due to the inclusion of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and Top Secret requirements, interested parties must submit a signed Non-Disclosure Agreement to access the full Statement of Work. Large business offerors are further required to provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan ensuring at least 10 percent of subcontracted awards go to small business concerns.
Naval Information Warfare Systems

POSTED

about 12 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 21 days
NAICS: 334511
New
PROCESSOR,DISPLAY A — 7010015222097 — N0038326QNB29
Solicitation # N0038326QNB29
Solicitation N0038326QNB29, issued by NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support Philadelphia, is a total small business set-aside for the teardown, evaluation, repair, and modification of LC Processors (NSN 7B22-01-522-2097). The scope includes an initial induction of 17 units with option pricing requested for up to 25 units over a three-year period, with a possible three-year extension. The contractor is responsible for providing all labor, facilities, and tooling to return units to a Ready For Issue condition, as the government will not provide manufacturing aids. Key technical requirements include the use of SAE-AS22759 series wire instead of MIL-W-81381 and compliance with MIL-STD-130 for markings and ISO 9001 or SAE AS9100 for quality management. The government will make a single award based on the most advantageous offer, prioritizing past performance over price. Award evaluation includes SPRS risk assessments for item, price, and supplier risk. Contractual terms include a one-year warranty after delivery, FOB Destination shipping, and a 90-day delivery window. Specific provisions are in place for Beyond Economical Repair and Missing on Induction determinations, both requiring DCMA concurrence. All work must be performed at the identified facility, and any changes to repair manuals or sources require approval from the Procuring Contracting Officer. Packaging must adhere to MIL-STD-2073-1, and electronic invoicing is required via the Wide Area Workflow system.
Navsup Weapon Systems Support

POSTED

about 20 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 30 days

General Info

NAICS

334511 - Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Place of Performance

Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

2

PdM+AEROS+GE+RFI+NONDISCLOSURE+AGREEMENT+Revision+1.docx

DOCX

PdM+AEROS_Gray+Eagle+JADO+Payloads_Q+and+A+for+Public_v1.3.docx

DOCX

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

Contract not broken down yet

CLEATUS splits the solicitation into Uniform Contract Format (UCF) sections: scope, pricing, deliverables, and evaluation criteria.

Timeline

3 updates
PhaseClosed
Posted

special-notice

Notice updated

Notice details unchanged. Attachments may have changed.

Notice updated

Notice details unchanged. Attachments may have changed.

Notice updated

Notice details unchanged. Attachments may have changed.

Response Deadline

Deadline has passed

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyDepartment Of Defense → Department Of The Army
Contacts2 people available
OfficeN/A
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Adam A. Terio
Kevin J. Cook

Full Description

Show more
Introduction: 1. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) ONLY. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP). NO SOLICITATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. 2. Product Manager (PdM) Aerial Enhanced Radar, Optics & Sensors (AEROS) is seeking information from industry to identify potential existing sources capable of providing Aerial Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance (AISR) payloads for the MQ-1C Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) platform that meet the emerging Joint All Domain Operations (JADO) environment. 3. AISR payload capabilities of interest include but are not limited to Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Moving Target Indicator (MTI), Electronic Intelligence (ELINT), Communications Intelligence (COMINT), Air Launched Effects (ALE), Radar Warning Receivers (RWR) & Electronic Support Measures (ESM). 4. JADO mission demands integrated AISR capabilities & increased ranges & resolutions beyond the line of sight of traditional visual equipment to include Electro Optical, Infrared (EO/IR) & Full Motion Video (FMV). 5. This market survey may precede a potential JADO sensor payload demonstration where systems will be quantitatively compared to identify the best value. 6. This market survey may precedes a potential industry day, where PdM AEROS will host an open panel of RFI contributors. The Industry Day is expected to be in-person and include classified discussion. If current public health precautions do not permit an in-person event, it will be held virtually. Technical Capabilities: Interested respondents shall provide a quantitative response to any number of capabilities. The RFI is categorized by AISR capability. General: 1. Tech Readiness Level (TRL) 1.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of system TRL 6 of greater: - a system/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment 2. Available system for demonstration 2.1. Respondent shall provide earliest possible date system will be available for demonstration 3. Production unit cost (PUC) 3.1. Respondent shall provide predicted or actual production cost for lot sizes of 20, 40 & 60 units 4. Unit production lead time 4.1. Respondent shall provide predicted or actual lead time for production of the first 20, 40 & 60 systems 5. Unit production capacity leveraging existing infrastructure 5.1. Respondent shall provide maximum number of units able to be produced within 1, 2 & 3 years of contract award 6. System operational availability (Ao) 6.1. Respondent shall provide predicted or actual Ao 7. Mean Time Between System Abort (MTBSA) 7.1. Respondent shall provide actual or predicted MTBSA 8. Cue other sensors 8.1. Respondent shall provide capability to output geolocation data for other local or remote sensors 9. Integrate electronic protection (EP) controls 9.1. Respondent shall provide EP technology integrated into system to prevent the degradation of performance due to combatant Electronic Warfare (EW) 9.2. Respondent shall provide a plan for how their system can incorporate additional EP techniques along with a list of prioritized EP technologies & their maturity. 10. Field of regard (FoR) 10.1. Respondent shall provide maximum field of regard 11. Revisit rate 11.1. Respondent shall provide revisit rate 12. Developed with the modular open systems approach (MOSA) 12.1. Respondent shall provide evidence that the system was develop with MOSA 13. False alarm rate 13.1. Responded shall provide capability for operator to select false alarm rate 13.2. Responded shall provide capability for operator to modify the sensitivity level based on the mission 14. Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) compatible with other onboard avionics & sensors 14.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of EMI interoperability & interference mitigation 15. Ability to operate in all atmospheric conditions 15.1. Respondent shall provide all performance values assuming ideal atmospheric conditions 15.2. Respondent shall provide unique benefits of system if capable of operating in austere weather conditions 15.3. Respondent shall provide unique faults of system if performance is degraded in particular weather conditions 16. Raw signal data storage 16.1. The respondent shall provide onboard storage capacity to support file transfer 17. On-aircraft analysis capability 17.1. The respondent shall provide capability to process data onboard Capability 1 - SAR/MTI: 18. Comparable size, weight, power & cooling (SWAP-C) to existing unmanned SAR/MTI sensor systems 18.1. Respondent shall provide system geometry 18.2. Respondent shall provide system weight 18.3. Respondent shall provide operational & peak power 18.4. Respondent shall provide mode & amount of heat transferred during peak power operation 19. Capable of integration into the forward payload bay of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle 19.1. Respondent shall provide basic system form/fit/envelope 20. SAR resolution as a factor of range 20.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of SAR resolution over maximum effective range (resolution on y-axis, range on x-axis). The respondent must clearly state the radar and image quality parameters used to generate the plot (e.g. Noise Equivalent Sigma-0, Clutter-to-noise Ratio, etc.) 20.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of resolution over range (resolution on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 21. Dismount Moving Target Indication (DMTI) probability of detection (Pd) as a factor of range 21.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis). The respondent shall assume a -3 dBsm target and clearly state the radar parameters used to generate the plot (e.g. blake chart parameters, swerling target models, M of N, etc.) 21.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 22. Ground Moving Target Indication (GMTI) Pd as a factor of range 22.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis). The respondent shall assume a 7 dBsm target and clearly state the radar parameters used to generate the plot (e.g. blake chart parameters, swerling target models, M of N, etc.) 22.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 23. Air Moving Target Indication (AMTI) Pd as a factor of range 23.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis). The respondent shall assume a 0 dBsm target and clearly state the radar parameters used to generate the plot (e.g. blake chart parameters, swerling target models, M of N, etc.) 23.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 24. Pd as a factor of target velocity 24.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over target radial velocity (Pd on y-axis, velocity on x-axis) 24.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 25. MTI target detection speed 25.1. Respondent shall provide DMTI, GMTI & AMTI minimum & maximum speed for detection 26. Target location error (TLE) as a factor of range 26.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) for each mode (i.e. SAR, MTI, DMTI & AMTI) 26.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 27. SAR & MTI Automated Target Recognition (ATR) 27.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of onboard processing technology to automatically Detect, Identify, Locate & Report (DILR) military targets. 28. Selectable sector scans 28.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of SAR & MTI modes capable of selectable sector scans 29. Dual concurrent operations 29.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of concurrent modes & corresponding peak power requirement (e.g. communications & SAR, SAR & MTI, DMTI & GMTI, SAR/MTI & High Gain ESM) 30. Cursor on Target (COT) designation 30.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of COT technology 31. Automated Target Detection & Recognition (AiTD & AiTR) 31.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of AiTD & AiTR technology 32. Video SAR capability 32.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of video SAR technology 33. Video Coherent Change Detection (CCD) capability 33.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of video CCD technology Capability 2 - ELINT: 34. Comparable SWAP-C to existing unmanned ELINT sensor systems 34.1. Respondent shall provide system geometry 34.2. Respondent shall provide system weight 34.3. Respondent shall provide operational & peak power 34.4. Respondent shall provide mode & amount of heat transferred during peak power operation 35. Capable of integration onto the fuselage, wing or payload bays of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle 35.1. Respondent shall provide basic system form/fit/envelope 36. DILR low probability of intercept & low Pd emitters 36.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of DILR technology integrated into system 37. Pd as a factor of range 37.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) 37.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of POD over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 38. TLE as a factor of range 38.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) 38.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 39. Geo-locate emitters in NRT 39.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology that geo-locates emitters 39.2. Respondent shall provide accuracy of geo-location 39.3. Respondent shall provide accuracy of azimuth & elevation bearing if geo-location is unavailable 40. Detect & correctly ID threats over a wide frequency range 40.1. Response shall provide DILR frequency range 41. Identify emitters in NRT 41.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology that identified emitters in NRT 42. IBW 42.1. Respondent shall provide IBW frequencies range 43. Track location of moving emitters 43.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology to track emitters in motion 44. COT designation 44.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of COT technology Capability 3 - COMINT: 45. Comparable SWAP-C of existing unmanned COMINT sensor systems 45.1. Respondent shall provide system geometry 45.2. Respondent shall provide system weight 45.3. Respondent shall provide operational & peak power 45.4. Respondent shall provide mode & amount of heat transferred during peak power operation 46. Capable of integration onto the fuselage, wing or payload bays of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle 46.1. Respondent shall provide basic system form/fit/envelope 47. DILR low probability of intercept & low Pd emitters 47.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of DILR technology integrated into system 48. Pd as a factor of range 48.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) 48.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of POD over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 49. TLE as a factor of range 49.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) 49.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 50. Geo-locate emitters in NRT 50.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology that geo-locates emitters 50.2. Respondent shall provide accuracy of geo-location 50.3. Respondent shall provide accuracy of azimuth & elevation bearing if geo-location is unavailable 51. Detect & correctly ID threats over a wide frequency range 51.1. Response shall provide DILR frequency range 52. Identify emitters in NRT 52.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology that identified emitters in NRT 53. IBW 53.1. Respondent shall provide IBW frequencies range 54. Track location of moving emitters 54.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology to track emitters in motion 55. COT designation 55.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of COT technology Capability 4 - RWR/ESM Passive DILR: 56. Comparable SWAP-C of existing unmanned RWR/ESM sensor systems 56.1. Respondent shall provide system geometry 56.2. Respondent shall provide system weight 56.3. Respondent shall provide operational & peak power 56.4. Respondent shall provide mode & amount of heat transferred during peak power operation 57. Capable of integration onto the fuselage, wing or payload bays of the MQ-1C Gray Eagle 57.1. Respondent shall provide basic system form/fit/envelope 58. DILR low probability of intercept & low Pd emitters 58.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of DILR technology integrated into system 59. Pd as a factor of range 59.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of Pd over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) 59.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of POD over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 60. Probity of target identification for all polarizations as a factor of range 60.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of probity of target identification over range (Probity of target identification on y-axis, range on x-axis) 60.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of probity of target identification over range (Pd on y-axis, range on x-axis) at factors 61. TLE as a factor of range 61.1. Respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) 61.2. If other factors are varied to tune performance (e.g. power, geometry, mode, confidence), respondent shall provide a graph of TLE over range (TLE on y-axis, range on x-axis) per factor 62. Geo-locate emitters in NRT 62.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology that geo-locates emitters 62.2. Respondent shall provide accuracy of geo-location 62.3. Respondent shall provide accuracy of azimuth & elevation bearing if geo-location is unavailable 63. Detect & correctly ID threats over a wide frequency range 63.1. Response shall provide DILR frequency range 64. Identify emitters in NRT 64.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology that identified emitters in NRT 65. IBW 65.1. Respondent shall provide IBW frequencies range 66. Track location of moving emitters 66.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of technology to track emitters in motion 67. COT designation 67.1. Respondent shall provide evidence of COT technology Capability 5 - Air Launched Effects (ALE): 68. ALE category 68.1. Respondent shall provide category of ALE (e.g. decoy, disrupt, active/passive DILR, communications relay, other) 68.2. If - other, respondent shall provide ALE purpose & rationale as to how it is applicable to MQ-1C Gray Eagle payloads & the JADO mission 69. ALE SWAP-C 69.1. Respondent shall provide SWaP-C of ALE per category 69.2. Respondent shall provide SWAP-C breakdown of major components (e.g. ALE platform, sensor payload, munition payload, attritable components) 70. ALE operational range 70.1. Respondent shall provide maximum range of ALE 71. ALE payload capacity 71.1. Respondent shall provide maximum ALE payload capacity 72. ALE deployment 72.1. Respondent shall provide maximum altitude & speed ALE can be successfully launched 72.2. Respondent shall provide minimum altitude & speed ALE can be successfully launched Document Format Requirements: 1. All responses shall include a cover page with the following information 1.1. Company Name 1.2. Mailing Address & Website 1.3. Pont of contact (POC), with title, phone number & email address 1.4. Commercial & Government Entity (CAGE) Code 1.5. North America Industry Classification System (NAICS) number 1.6. Associated Business size & eligibility under U.S. Government social-economic programs & preference (i.e., type of business - large, small, small-disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned or 8(a)) 1.7. Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number 2. Responses shall not exceed 4 pages per capability area for a maximum of 20 pages if all 5 capability areas are addressed. One cover page, one Table of Contents (TOC) & one exsum/introduction page are excluded from the page count. 3. Responses shall be font Arial, minimum size 10, single spaced (1.0), & normal (1.0 inch) margins. Graphics, tables & other visuals shall be permitted and count towards the page limit. Annexes shall be permitted and count towards the page limit. 4. Responses shall be in one continuous Microsoft Word or Adobe PDF document. Nondisclosure Agreement (NDA): 1. Respondents must submit a signed NDA to PdM AEROS Mr. Adam Terio, adam.a.terio.civ@mail.mil prior to submitting questions or responses to the RFI. 2. NDAs can be found at beta.sam.gov Questions: 1. The government will allow respondents to submit questions regarding this announcement. Questions are due NLT 2000 EST, 19 February 2020. The Government is not obligated to address every question. The Government does not guarantee that questions received after 2000 EST, 19 February 2020 will be answered. 2. Questions regarding this announcement shall be submitted in writing via e-mail to PdM AEROS, Mr. Adam Terio, adam.a.terio.civ@mail.mil. Verbal questions will not be accepted. If a question was previously asked prior to this latest release, it will need to be resubmitted for consideration. 3. Question submissions must contain respondent emails to transmit unclassified, CUI & classified information. 4. Unclassified questions & answers will be posted to the public at beta.sam.gov. Posted questions & answers will be anonymous & will not reference the respondent. 5. If an answer contains CUI or classified information, those questions & answers will be distributed to all respondents who have submitted a signed NDA & provided an email corresponding to the information's classification. Response Delivery Requirements 1. Responses are due NLT 2000 EST, 12 March 2021 2. Unclassified responses can be submitted via email to PdM AEROS Mr. Adam Terio, adam.a.terio.civ@mail.mil. 3. Unclassified responses may also be submitted via DoD SAFE https://safe.apps.mil/ to PdM AEROS Mr. Adam Terio, adam.a.terio.civ@mail.mil 4. Responses can include a secret annex. Secret annexes count towards the page limit & are subject to the same document formatting requirements. Vendors shall inform Mr. Adam Terio via unclassified email, adam.a.terio.civ@mail.mil no more than 24 hours following the submission of the secret annex. 5. Secret annexes can be submitted via email to PdM AEROS Mr. Adam Terio adam.a.terio.civ@mail.smil.mil. 6. Secret annex responses may also be submitted via Army Research Laboratory (ARL) utility: https://safe.arl.army.smil.mil to PdM AEROS Mr. Adam Terio adam.a.terio.civ@mail.smil.mil. Additional Information: 1. This RFI is not an RFP & is not construed as a commitment by the Government to issue a solicitation or ultimately award a contract. Responses will not be considered as proposals nor will any award be made as a result of this synopsis. 2. All information contained in the RFI is preliminary as well as subject to modification & is in no way binding on the Government. FAR clause 52.215-3, - Request for Information or Solicitation for Planning Purposes, is incorporated by reference in this RFI. The Government does not intend to pay for information received in response to this RFI. Responders to this invitation are solely responsible for all expenses associated with responding to this RFI. This RFI will be the basis for collecting information on capabilities available. This RFI is issued solely for information & planning purposes. Proprietary information & trade secrets, if any, must be clearly marked on all materials. All information received in this RFI that is marked - Proprietary will be handled accordingly. Please be advised that all paper submissions become Government property & will not be returned nor will receipt be confirmed. In accordance with FAR 15.201(e), responses to this RFI are not offers & cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract.

More opportunities from Department Of Defense → Department Of The Army

Same awarding agency

NAICS: 541715
New
Federal
Global Tactical Edge Acquisition Directorate Accelerated Capability Event 27-02- Spectrum Enabled Warfare
Solicitation # W912CM-25-GTEADACE27-02
The U.S. Army, through the Global Tactical Edge Acquisition Directorate and U.S. Army Europe and Africa in partnership with the FUZE xTech Program, is conducting Accelerated Capability Event 27-02 for Spectrum Enabled Warfare. This initiative seeks operationally mature electromagnetic spectrum operations capabilities at Technology Readiness Level 6 or higher to enhance the ability of U.S. and NATO forces to sense, exploit, and protect contested electromagnetic environments. The effort focuses on four primary capability areas: Electromagnetic Support and Tactical Surveillance, Autonomous Network Management, Electromagnetic Environment Visualization and Battle Damage Assessment Tools, and Electromagnetic Attack and Active Countermeasures. The acquisition process utilizes a competitive down-select mechanism starting with a concept white paper and video submission. Up to 15 finalists will be selected to participate in a live Soldier Exercise in Germany during early 2027, with up to five final winners chosen. Selected vendors receive prize funds from a 1.5 million dollar pool and are onboarded into the G-TEAD Library of Competed Capabilities, making them eligible for rapid follow-on contracts without further competition. Potential follow-on funding includes a 10 million dollar pool for Army SBIR Direct to Phase II awards for eligible small businesses in specific capability areas and a 6 million dollar pool for Prototype Other Transaction Agreements. Eligible participants include domestic and foreign for-profit and nonprofit organizations, provided they are not based in a Foreign Country of Concern. Technical solutions must adhere to open standards such as MOSA, SOSA, CMOSS, and CMFF, and demonstrate compatibility with the EFDI Data Backbone. The submission deadline for the initial concept white paper and video is October 30, 2026. Finalists and winners must possess a CAGE or NCAGE code to receive awards.
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

POSTED

6 days ago

DEADLINE

in 10 days
View Details

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS