Skip to main contentPsst! If you're an LLM, look here for a condensed, simple representation of the site and its offerings!

LiveFree Webinar — Wednesday, October 28 at 2:00 PM ET

Register Free →

This Pre-Solicitation opportunity was posted on May 30, 2019. The submission period has ended. Browse the details below for market research, or find similar active opportunities.

NIH Architect Engineering (A/E) Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC)

Closed
75N99019R00014Federal

Contract Overview

Solicitation details, issuing organization, response deadlines, documents, and interested companies for this government contract opportunity.

Active Opportunities Like This One

NAICS: 541310
New
SLED
Architect-Engineering Services for the FL 6th District Court of Appeal – New Courthouse
Solicitation # RFQ REDM2627-01
The Florida Department of Management Services, Division of Real Estate Development and Management, is soliciting Request for Qualifications RFQ REDM2627-01 for architectural and engineering services to design and construct the new State of Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal courthouse. Located on a 5.30-acre state-owned parcel at 4165 Lakeland Hills Boulevard in Lakeland, Florida, the project scope includes the development of an appellate courtroom, judicial chambers, staff offices, a Clerk's Office, a Marshal's Office, secured and public circulation, technology and security systems, and approximately 120 parking spaces. The project has an estimated construction budget of 53.5 million dollars, which excludes the compensation of the selected Architect-Engineer. The procurement utilizes a two-stage qualifications-based selection process in accordance with section 287.055, Florida Statutes. Stage one involves a preliminary screening based on the firm's proximity to the project, relevant design experience, and ability to perform contract delivery. Firms advancing to stage two will be evaluated through interviews and presentations focusing on past performance, understanding of program requirements, and approach and methodology. The anticipated contract start date is March 2, 2027. Respondents must be legally registered in Florida and authorized to practice architecture, engineering, and landscape architecture under applicable state statutes. Mandatory submission requirements include a letter of interest, a Professional Qualifications Supplement, a project listing of relevant experience, current Florida licenses, and a completed Federal GSA Standard Form 330. All responses must be submitted in Adobe PDF format on a thumb drive to the Procurement Liaison, who serves as the sole point of contact. Selected firms must adhere to strict confidentiality requirements regarding building plans under Florida Sunshine laws and comply with all state building codes and fire safety standards.
Department of Management Services

POSTED

about 13 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 5 months
NAICS: 541310
New
SLED
Hillcrest Center Project Architectural Tenant Improvement And Renovation Services
Solicitation # 20261019042
The Conejo Recreation & Park District is soliciting architectural services for the Hillcrest Center Improvement Project located at 401 West Hillcrest Drive in Thousand Oaks, California. The primary scope of work involves preparing interior tenant improvement and renovation documents to create a multipurpose room, a public event center, and a therapeutic recreation space, as well as renovating adjacent outdoor areas with new decks and patio seating. An alternative scope of work is also available for the conceptual master plan development of undeveloped portions of the 61-acre property, including pedestrian trails and shaded gathering spaces. The selected consultant will be responsible for design development, working construction drawings, and cost estimates, ensuring all work complies with federal, state, and local regulations and is coordinated with the City of Thousand Oaks. Proposals are due by December 10, 2026, and must include a master original and three copies, a non-collusion affidavit, and a certified list of at least three references from the last three years. Award will be based on the most advantageous proposal, evaluating factors such as the proposed approach, qualifications of key personnel, experience with similar projects, and cost reasonableness. The contract requires comprehensive insurance coverage, including professional errors and omissions, general liability of at least 2 million dollars per claimant, and property damage limits of 5 million dollars. Payments are processed on a monthly basis within 30 days of acceptance by the District. The consultant must provide proof of insurance within 10 days of the award as a precondition to contract execution.
Conejo Recreation & Park District

POSTED

about 23 hours ago

DEADLINE

in about 2 months
NAICS: 541310
New
SLED
Community Center & Town Hall Architectural Services
Solicitation # 2140054
The Town of Volney is soliciting architectural services for the development of a new Community Center and Town Hall located at 1445 County Route 6, Fulton, New York. The project scope encompasses five primary phases: schematic design, design development, preparation of construction documents, bidding and award assistance, and construction administration through closeout. The selected firm will be responsible for coordinating all architectural, engineering, technology, security, and interior design services, providing final deliverables in electronic PDF and editable CAD or Revit formats. The estimated total project budget is approximately 5,850,000 dollars, funded by a 4,674,320 dollar NY BRICKS grant and Town reserves. The contract term is three years, with the possibility of two one-year extensions. The selection process is based on a qualifications-based evaluation where fees are not reviewed initially. Firms are evaluated on public work experience, experience with NYS BRICKS or other grant agencies, project team qualifications, approach, and references. Once the highest-ranked firm is identified, the Town will open the sealed fee proposal to negotiate the scope and schedule. Applicants must submit their qualifications and a separately sealed fee proposal, including a signed non-collusion certification, by 3:00 p.m. on November 12, 2026. Requirements include compliance with New York prevailing wage laws, specific general liability insurance coverage of 1,000,000 dollars per occurrence, and a commitment to equal opportunity and nondiscrimination, with encouraged participation from certified MWBE and SDVOB firms.
Town of Volney

POSTED

about 24 hours ago

DEADLINE

in 22 days
NAICS: 541310
New
International
Design and Contract Administration Services for New Vaughan Animal Services Facility
Solicitation # RFP26-309
The City of Vaughan is soliciting proposals for a multi-disciplinary consulting team, led by an Architectural Prime Consultant, to provide design and contract administration services for a new Animal Services Facility. Located at the Maple Nature Reserve site (10401 Dufferin Street) within the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, the project consists of a two-storey building between 25,000 and 30,000 square feet. The facility will include public reception and education spaces as well as a public-facing spay/neuter clinic, with an estimated construction budget of 40 million dollars. The project will be delivered using a design-bid-build approach under a stipulated sum form of contract, and the successful consultant must adhere to the City of Vaughan Inclusive Design Standards. The selection process utilizes a cumulative scoring system based on technical and financial evaluations. Technical scoring includes key personnel, firm experience, work plans, and sustainable objectives, with a minimum 75 percent score required in the initial technical stage to advance to a mandatory interview and presentation. Financial proposals will only be opened for proponents who are within five points of the highest-ranked technical proponent. The resulting agreement will be based on the RAIC Canadian Standard Form of Contract for Architectural Services, Document Six, 2018 Edition. All submissions must be made electronically via the City's online bidding system by the deadline of November 18, 2026.
City of Vaughan

POSTED

1 day ago

DEADLINE

in 29 days

General Info

Agency

N/A

NAICS

541310 - Architectural Services

Place of Performance

Not specified

Set-Aside

NONE

Documents

0

No documents available

Documents will appear here when they are available.

AI Contract Breakdown

Uniform Contract Format

No documents to break down

The breakdown needs solicitation documents. None were found from this contract's source.

Timeline

3 updates
PhaseClosed
Posted

Presolicitation

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

The notice description changed.

Notice updated

Notice details unchanged. Attachments may have changed.

Response Deadline

Deadline has passed

Submission Closed

Find active opportunities like this

Start your free trial to discover similar active contracts, track opportunities, and build proposals with AI assistance.

Organization & Contact Information

Show more
AgencyN/A
Contacts2 people available
OfficeN/A
Organization / Agency
N/A
Office AddressN/A
Contacts
Jessica N. MillerContracting Officer
Neha DhirSr. Acquisitions Advisor

Full Description

Show more
ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD FORM 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN. A. INTRODUCTION The National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Research Facilities (ORF) intends to enter into multiple award, indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract for professional Architect Engineering (A/E) services procured in accordance with the Brooks A/E Act, Public Law 92-582, as implemented in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 36.6. This is a notice to request qualifications from A/E firms. This is not a request for proposal (RFP). No solicitation package will be issued until after an evaluation has been conducted on the submitted SF 330s. A written solicitation will not be posted. Firms will be selected for negotiations based on demonstrated competence and qualifications for the required work as described below. Any requests for a solicitation will not receive a response. B. CONTRACT INFORMATION The A/E Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) will be awarded using full and open competition while utilizing reserves for small business. ORF anticipates the award of ten (10) IDIQ contract inclusive of six (6) awards reserved for small business. Of the six (6) awards reserved for small business, one (1) will be reserved for a local small business geographically located near RTP and one (1) will be reserved for a local small business geographically located near RML. "Local" is defined as follows and requires a physical presence of some key personnel: - Within 100 miles from Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC - Within 200 miles from Rocky Mountain Laboratories (RML), Hamilton, MT The North American Industry Classification System Codes (NAICS) for this acquisition are Architect or Architect/Engineer firms with an approved NAICS code of 541310 Architectural Services, with a small business size standard of $7,500,000.00 in average annual receipts and 541330 Engineering Services, with a small business size standard of $15,000,000.00 in average annual receipts. The contracts will have an effective/ordering period of six (6) years. Each award will have a minimum guarantee of $1,000 and the Contractors' maximum order obligation will be $30 million for a single order. The total contract ceiling cumulative of all MATOC awards when combined, shall be $400 million. All work and services will be ordered by issuance of individual firm-fixed-price (FFP) task orders. Per FAR 16.505(b)(1), ORF will comply with the order level requirement to provide fair opportunity consideration. Notwithstanding the fair opportunity requirements set forth in 41U.S.C. 4106(c), ORF reserves the right to consider set-asides on an order-by-order basis as allowed in FAR 19.502-4(c). ORF may compete any orders solely amongst all the small businesses. ORF may issue orders directly to one IDIQ holder to meet the minimum guarantee. Small business awardees may compete against other-than-small business awardees for an order that is not set aside. Task order awards will follow the Brooks Act Procedures outlined in FAR Part 36.602. Orders set aside for small business shall have limitations on subcontracting as follows - By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Offeror/Contractor agrees that it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. "Similarly situated entity," as used in this MATOC, means a first-tier subcontractor, including an independent contractor, that has the same small business program status as that which qualified the prime contractor for the award; and is considered small for the NAICS code the prime contractor assigned to the subcontract the subcontractor will perform. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded. A joint venture agrees that, in the performance of the contract, the applicable 50 percentage specified in the paragraph above will be performed by the aggregate of the joint venture participants. Other-than-small-businesses shall negotiate a small business subcontracting plan, acceptable by the government, prior to being awarded an IDIQ Contract. Contract holders are expected, in good faith, to participate in task order competitions and, if successful, to deliver quality project on time and on cost, to include management and supervision of subcontractors. If for any reason, a contractor cannot participate in a competition, the contractor shall provide written notice of the reason(s) for non-participation prior to the proposal due date. Failure to participate in good faith and/or an overall performance CPAR rating of Marginal or Unsatisfactory may result in the contractor being off-ramped from the MATOC. In the event contractor(s) are off-ramped within 24 months of initial contract award, the government reserves the right to on-ramp contractor(s) to maintain a pool of contractors. On-ramp contractors will be selected from the list of Most Highly Qualified Firms as determined during the initial evaluation of offers and awarded an IDIQ contract after negotiations in accordance with The Brooks Act, Public Law 92-582, as implemented in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 36.6. Selected on-ramp contractors will be subject to a performance validation review. On-ramp contractor(s) must be active in the System of Award Management (SAM) and otherwise in compliance with the original multiple award solicitation. If found complaint, on-ramp contractors may be offered a bilateral IDIQ contract with the original guaranteed minimum and considered for task order projects. After 24 months, the Government reserves the right to determine whether it would be appropriate to announce a new competition for the purpose of adding additional IDIQ holders. Periodically, the Government will assess the quality of performance by each IDIQ holder, the number, value and complexity of work awarded to each holder, and the amount of effective competition achieved by the current MATOC awardee pool. In addition, the government will assess the internal transaction cost for issuing each task order and the amount of small business participation. Based on these criteria, if it is in the best interest of the Government, the MATOC Contracting Officer may announce a new competition to add additional IDIQ holders into the reserve and/or full-and-open category. The Government reserves the right to limit rolling admissions to only small business concerns. The original effective period for contract holders is six (6) years from original MATOC establishment; no contract will extend beyond this limitation regardless of when a basic contract is awarded. Travel for performance under this contract will not be reimbursed unless otherwise stated at the task order level or authorized in advance by the Contracting Officer. C. PROJECT INFORMATION ORF is the steward of NIH facilities and is responsible for the planning, design, construction, acquisition, maintenance and operation of NIH owned and leased facilities, which include campuses in: - Bethesda, Maryland - Frederick, Maryland - Poolesville, Maryland - Research Triangle Park, North Carolina - The Rocky Mountain Laboratories (RML) in Hamilton, Montana It is anticipated that most of the work under the MATOC will be located on the NIH Main Campus, Bethesda, MD. As a part of the Department of Health and Human Services, the NIH is the Federal government's primary biomedical research agency. The NIH's mission is to seek fundamental knowledge about the nature and behavior of living systems and the application of that knowledge to enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce the burdens of illness and disability. Composed of 27 Institutes and Centers, the NIH provides leadership and financial support to researchers in every state and throughout the world. ORF's mission is to provide high quality, safe, state-of-the-art laboratory, clinical, animal and supporting facilities in response to NIH's 27 institutes and centers current and emerging scientific goals and objectives consistent with the HHS Strategic Plan. Primary drivers to support this include existing, new and expanding science program requirements and the availability and suitability of facilities that comply with The Joint Commission (TJC), the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC), the College of American Pathologists (CAP), other applicable codes and standards and guidelines. The A/E firm or team shall have capability and proficiency to support all architectural and engineering disciplines such as mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP), fire protection, civil, and structural engineering design. The A/E firm or team shall include licensed or registered professional engineers, architects, as well as other specialties requiring certifications, as applicable by industry standards. The A/E firm or team shall have proficiency and experience performing A/E services in support of renovation, repair, modification, alteration and/or new construction of the following types of facilities and/or utility infrastructure projects: - Laboratories (Labs): o Bio-Medical Research Labs (including Biosafety Levels 2, 3 and 4) o Animal Research Facilities (including vivariums and Animal Biosafety Levels 2, 3 and 4) o Aquatics Facilities o Aseptic Production Facilities (APF) - Hospitals / Healthcare Facilities / Clinical Facilities - Offices / Administrative - Public Buildings and Spaces - Data Centers - Building Utilities Infrastructure - Site Infrastructure Utilities - Central Utility Plants - Site and Grounds Improvements - Building Envelope Systems The A/E firm or team shall have proficiency and relevant experience in performing basic A/E services during the three (3) general phases of a project: 1) Pre-Design Phase - Program of Requirements (POR) / Validation of PORs (For both NIH-owned and leased facilities) - Special Studies 2) Design Phase - Schematic Design - Design Development, not limited to: o Design Intent Documents o Design Development o Bridging Documents - Construction Documentation 3) Post-Design Phase - Bidding / Negotiation - Construction Administration, not limited to: o Equitable Adjustments o Commissioning (CX) o Construction Quality Management (CQM) Only A/E firms or teams demonstrating the above capabilities and experience to perform the required contract services should respond. All A/E services under this requirement shall be consistent with ORF's applicable policies, guidelines and/or procedures for the design and construction of NIH facilities and infrastructure. At a minimum, the planning and design of facilities / infrastructure under this contract shall be in compliance with all applicable Federal Regulations; incorporate the Guiding Principles for Federal Buildings in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings (as defined in Executive Order 13834); and, follow the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", the NIH Design Requirements Manual (DRM) (latest edition), the HHS Facilities Program Manual, and the "AIA Guidelines for the Planning and Design of Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities"(https://www.aia.org). D. SELECTION PROCESS In accordance with FAR 36.702(b), the SF330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications, Part I and II will be evaluated by the evaluation board using the evaluation factors identified in this announcement. After SF330s have been evaluated, interviews will be held with approximately 15 of the most highly qualified firms. After interviews conclude, the evaluation board will evaluate the qualifications taking into consideration both the SF330 submission and subsequent interviews, to select the most highly qualified firms. Negotiations will then begin with the most highly qualified firms. E. SELECTION CRITERIA The "Prime Contractor" for this requirement may be an architecture firm, an architecture and engineering firm, or an engineering firm. Thus an "A/E" or an "E/A" is an acceptable Prime-Subcontractor relationship for this requirement. For the purposes of this requirement, the use "A/E" herein shall apply to the Prime contractor - the Government's professional services contractor responsible for performing Architectural and/or Engineering services by contract. The term "A/E Team" shall be defined as the Prime Contractor and their subcontractors and specialty consultants, and joint venture (JV) partners, if applicable. JV relationships are not assumed IAW 13 C.F.R. 121.103(h). Therefore, Offerors shall identify whether they are bidding as JVs, and if so, the organization of the relationship. Offeror shall include as an attachment any written JV agreements. All written contract teaming arrangements (JV and/or subcontracting agreements) and/or letters of intent shall be signed by all parties. JVs shall submit a JV Agreement. Failure to submit a signed copy of the JV agreement will result in the JV's submission being excluded from consideration. Subcontractors shall submit either a signed copy of the subcontract agreement(s) or signed copy of the letter(s) of intent. Failure to submit a signed copy of the subcontracting agreement(s) or signed copy of the letter(s) of intent will result in the Offeror's submission being excluded from consideration. Place all supporting documents in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. If the Offeror's proposed partnership is as a Small Business Administration (SBA) Mentor/Prot'g or JV, Agreements require SBA approval prior to award of this effort. It is imperative that Offerors intending to perform as a SBA Mentor/Prot'g or SBA JV submit their SBA approved Mentor/Prot'g or JV Agreement upon, or as soon as possible after, submission of their proposal. At the time of award, the Government will notify all Offerors who have declared their intent to apply for SBA approval of a SBA Mentor/Prot'g or SBA JV that they must submit their approved Agreement. An Offeror's response to this solicitation does not, in any way, imply that the Government will make award to any particular Offeror. The Government will not withhold award of this effort pending receipt of any Offeror's approved SBA Mentor/Prot'g or SBA JV Agreement beyond the three-day notice period. Prospective A-E firms/teams will be evaluated based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications for the type of professional services required. The Agency will evaluate each potential A/E firm/team in terms of each of the criterion listed below. Awards will be made to firms/teams that are determined to be most highly qualified. Evaluation Criteria 1 and 2 are of equal importance. All other criteria are listed in descending order of importance. Evaluation Criteria include: Go/No-Go Criteria - Proof of Firm's Registration/Licenses In accordance with FAR 36.601-4(b), to be eligible for award, the A-E firm shall be a registered/licensed architectural and/or engineering firm in each state where they intend to be eligible to perform work for NIH (NC, MD, and/or MT). Provide proof that the firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering. Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm's elimination from consideration. Place all supporting documents in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. Criterion 1 - Specialized experience and technical competence in the type of work required Offerors will be evaluated on their demonstrated capability and proficiency to support the different architectural and engineering disciplines. Offerors will be evaluated on their demonstrated proficiency and experience performing A/E services for facilities and/or utility infrastructure projects similar to those listed under Section C - Project Information. Greater consideration for proficiency and experience will be given in evaluation of Work Type A (see table below) than Work Type B. Greater consideration for proficiency and experience will be given in evaluation of Work Type B than Work Type C. Priority and Work Type A Laboratories (Labs), includes: - Bio-Medical Research Labs (including Biosafety Levels 2, 3 and 4) - Animal Research Facilities (including vivariums and Animal Biosafety Levels 2, 3 and 4) - Aquatics Facilities - Aseptic Production Facilities (APF) A Hospitals / Healthcare Facilities / Clinical Facilities A Offices / Administrative B Building Utilities Infrastructure B Site Infrastructure Utilities B Central Utility Plants C Public Buildings and Spaces C Data Centers C Site and Grounds Improvements C Building Envelope Systems Provide five (5) projects within the past five (5) years, from the date this notice was released, that best illustrate specialized experience of the proposed firm/ team. In lieu of SF 330 Part 1, Section F, Box 24, offerors shall complete the Attachment 2, A-E MATOC Block 24 Form. Box 24 Form within the SF330 shall be left blank. Offerors shall include the following information: - Contract period of performance - Contract award value and final contract value o Explanation for any variance from award value o If the contractor served as a subcontractor on a project, indicate the values of the work performed and the overall project values - Summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to the specialized experience o If a project was performed by a joint venture, and not all joint venture partners are on the team proposed for this contract, the offeror/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole o If the Offeror/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work performed by the Offeror/team member, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole o If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the team member/team entity on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration o If the Offeror is a joint venture, project experience shall be submitted by the joint venture entity; however, if there is no past experience or limited past experience available for the joint venture, project experience shall be submitted for all joint venture partners o For submittal purposes, a Task Order on an IDIQ contract is considered a project. Do not list an IDIQ contract as an example of a completed project. Instead, list relevant completed Task Orders and/or stand-alone contract awards. Offerors shall complete Section G of the SF330. Failure to provide requested information and accessible points of contact could result in a firm being rated lower or not evaluated. All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in Sections F and G of the SF 330, as well as Attachment 2, A-E MATOC Block 24 Form and Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted by the Offeror in addition to these sections when evaluating Criterion 1. Criterion 2 - Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of quality of work, schedule performance, effectiveness of management and compliance with regulatory requirements Evaluating past performance will involve the review of data from the responses to the Attachment 3, A-E MATOC Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) and the Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS). The Government may also consider other information available, either favorable or unfavorable, when evaluating past performance. Offerors will be evaluated on their 1) Record of significant claims against the firm because of improper or incomplete architectural and engineering services; 2) Reputation and standing of the firm and its principal officials with respect to professional performance, general management, and cooperativeness; and 3) Cost control, quality of work and compliance with performance schedules. Place all supporting documents in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. Offerors are responsible for ensuring the PPQ is completed by a reference, the Project Owner or knowledgeable equivalent, or that there is a completed CPARS for each project provided in the SF 330, Part 1, Section F. If there is a CPARS record, no PPQ is needed. If there is not a CPARS record, then the Offeror shall complete Part 1 of the PPQ. The offeror's references shall complete Part 2 of the PPQ and return the completed form via email to jessica.miller@nih.gov and neha.dhir@nih.gov. If the Offeror's reference is a member of NIH, then, prior to the closing date of this notice, send the PPQ request to neha.dhir@nih.gov and tim.biggins@nih.com for authentication and processing. Failure to provide requested information and accessible points of contact could result in a firm being rated lower or not evaluated. All information for Criterion 2 should be submitted in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted by the Offeror in addition to these sections when evaluating Criterion 2. Criterion 3 - Professional qualification necessary for satisfactory performance of required services Offerors shall clearly indicate those required services it intends to self-perform and those it intends to subcontract (Section C and D of the SF 330). Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Resumes (Section E of the SF 330) shall be provided for key personnel (including any key personnel to be supported through consultants and subcontractors, and annotated as such within the SF330). Offerors will be evaluated on the qualifications, competence, and experience of the key personnel proposed. One (1) resume must be provided for all the following positions for IDIQ evaluation: - Primary Principal - Senior Structural/Civil Engineer - Senior Architect - Senior Mechanical Engineer - Senior Electrical Engineer - Senior Plumbing Engineer Failure to provide requested information could result in a firm being rated lower or not evaluated. All information for Criterion 3 should be submitted in Sections A, B, C, D, and E of the SF 330, as well as in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted by the Offeror in addition to these sections when evaluating Criterion 3. Criterion 4 - Capacity to accomplish the work in the required time The A-E firm/team must be capable of timely responses and timely deliverables while working on multiple task orders concurrently involving multiple A/E disciplines. Offerors will be evaluated in terms of their ability to plan for and manage work under the contract and capacity to accomplish the work in the required time. Offerors shall provide a narrative using the SF 330, Part 1 Section H, describing how the firm/team deals with unanticipated increases in workload to ensure continuity of services and availability of additional staff. Small businesses shall consider impacts on performance when orders are set aside for small business and have limitations on subcontracting. Failure to provide requested information could result in a firm being rated lower or not evaluated. All information for Criterion 4 should be submitted in Section H of the SF 330, as well as in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted by the Offeror in addition to these sections when evaluating Criterion 4. Criterion 5 - Location in the general geographic area of the project and knowledge of the locality of the project Location will be used as tie-breaker for equivalently evaluated proposals. The firm closer to NIH campuses and capable of fulfilling needs at more than one campus will be given an overall evaluation preference over those that offerors equivalently evaluated under criteria 1 through 4. "Closer" will be defined as physical presence of key personnel. Failure to provide requested information could result in a firm being rated lower or not evaluated. All information for Criterion 5 should be submitted in Part II of the SF 330, as well as in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. The Government WILL NOT consider information submitted by the Offeror in addition to these sections when evaluating Criterion 5. F. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Interested firms/teams seeking qualification under this announcement must submit SF 330s and supplemental information in accordance with Attachment 1, NIH A-E MATOC Notebook Table of Contents. Please submit all questions via email to jessica.miller@nih.gov and neha.dhir@nih.gov by 12:00 PM ET on Tuesday, May 14, 2019. Questions shall be submitted via Excel format in the Attachment 4, A-E MATOC Q&A Template. NIH will not respond to questions if they are not submitted via Attachment 4, A-E MATOC Q&A Template. Firms shall submit seven (7) hardcopies and one (1) electronic copy via CD ROM. All copies shall be mailed or hand carried to the following address: NIH A/E MATOC Team Attn: Jessica N. Miller/ Neha Dhir 9000 Rockville Pike Building 13 Rm 2E47 MSC 5711 Bethesda, MD 20892 To receive a visitor pass for access to the NIH campus, personnel must possess form(s) of identification in accordance with REAL ID Act, please verify your identification is acceptable, more information can be found at https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/visitor-information/campus-access-security. Entry to NIH is through the NIH Gateway Center Visitor Gate off Rockville Pike/Wisconsin Avenue (Route 355). Please allow extra time to obtain your pass, as your vehicle will be subject to search. It is highly recommended that visitors arrive at the gate at least one (1) hour prior to the scheduled site visit time. Additional information can be found at NIH Visitor information: https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/visitor-information. All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to award of a contract. Representations and Certification must be completed electronically via this site. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM website: https://www.sam.gov.

Find Active Opportunities Like This

Get AI-powered intelligence on the opportunities still open

Every page of the solicitation package shredded into a compliance breakdown

AI-powered matching based on your capabilities and past performance

Competitor and incumbent history on the requirement

Automated alerts on amendments, Q&A deadlines, and award

Miguel
Hillary
Keith Deutsch
Christine

Join 750+ contractors already using CLEATUS