PLATE, RETAINING, ELE

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded TRIMAN INDUSTRIES INC, identified by CAGE code 0ZBE8, a fixed-price contract under solicitation SPE7M5-26-T-077M for the delivery of 4,000 units of the retaining plate, electrical (NSN 5935013820152), with a total contract value of $18,045.88. The award was issued on July 15, 2026, and performance is required within 240 days after award, with delivery to the designated destination at W62G2T, W1A8 DLA DIST SAN JOAQUIN in Tracy, California. The contract specifies FOB Origin terms and mandates full compliance with DLA and Department of Defense standards for packaging, marking, and barcoding, including MIL-STD-129 for labeling and 2D Data Matrix barcodes, ASTM D3951 for non-hazardous materials, and TQ Requirement IP025 for hazardous items as defined by FED-STD-313. All shipments must be properly marked with required identification numbers and unit of issue quantities, and payment must be processed electronically through WAWF using the specified remittance address and accounting code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189. The contract incorporates a wide array of Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses, many under Deviation 2026-00038, including those governing patent indemnity, unauthorized obligations, safeguarding contractor information systems, combating human trafficking, employment eligibility verification, sustainable procurement, equal opportunity for workers with disabilities (with certain terms waived), and accelerated payments to small business subcontractors. The clause structure includes multiple alternates for authorization and consent related to patent and copyright use. While the award was made to a small business, no specific socioeconomic designation beyond HUBZone eligibility is confirmed in the documentation. Inspection and acceptance are the Government’s responsibility and occur at destination, with compliance to the DLA Master List of Technical and Quality Requirements taking precedence over commercial standards. No formal statement of work or technical specifications were provided, and key administrative contacts such as the contracting officer’s representative or points of contact for WAWF are not identified in the available information, nor are any attachments or formal evaluation factors detailed in the record. The contract is non-option with