POLYURETHANE COATING

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded a delivery order under contract SPE8ES24D0005 to ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC, with a CAGE code of 79343, for the procurement of 2.000 boxes of polyurethane coating identified by NSN 8010015753004. The total contract value is $575.86, issued at a fixed unit price of $287.93 per box, with no variance allowed in quantity. The order was awarded on July 16, 2026, with a required delivery date of July 30, 2026, under FOB Destination terms, meaning the contractor is responsible for all transportation costs and risks until the goods reach the designated delivery point at the Hazmat Center, 8672 Edson St, San Diego, CA 92145. The contractor is identified as a small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business, triggering relevant federal reporting and compliance obligations under FAR Part 19 and socioeconomic programs. Packaging must be shipped via traceable means, explicitly prohibiting parcel post, and all shipments must be clearly marked with the base contract number SPE8ES-24-D-0005 and the delivery order number SPE8ES-26-F-62WX, along with the transportation control number R091166194HD19 and RDD identifier 3-POS RDD. The delivery is subject to government inspection and acceptance at the destination, with compliance governed by the underlying base contract and the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) under 15 CFR 700, which designates this as a rated order. Payment will be processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service in Columbus, Ohio, using accounting code BX: 97X4930 5CBX 001 2620 S33189, and the award was transmitted via Electronic Data Interchange. The contracting officer is Nate Prattico, and while no contract clauses, attachments, or evaluation factors are explicitly listed in the provided documentation, the nature of the transaction—low value, single line item, fixed price, no technical specifications beyond the item description—indicates it was awarded under a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable methodology. No contracting officer representative is identified, and no additional