PRODUCTION LOT TESTING (GOVERNMENT)

The contract awarded to AIRTRONICS, LLC (CAGE 58078) under solicitation SPE4A6-25-T-31TL and contract number SPE4A626PE939 is valued at $24,850.00 and was awarded on July 21, 2026, by the Defense Logistics Agency through its Aviation ASC Commodities Division in Richmond, Virginia. The scope of work includes production lot testing conducted by the government and the supply of a specific bearing component identified by NSN 3110009435177. Performance is expected to occur at the contractor’s location in Tucson, Arizona, with the place of delivery not explicitly defined beyond that. The contract is executed under a modification referenced as P00001, issued on February 13, 2026, and finalized with the award on the stated date, though the period of performance and delivery schedule remain unspecified. The contract type is not formally designated in the documentation, and no detailed pricing table or line-item breakdown is provided beyond the two described deliverables. The most significant contractual requirement is the inclusion of FAR 52.222-90 Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors, implemented under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which mandates the contractor to adhere strictly to non-discrimination principles in employment and subcontracting practices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. This clause imposes affirmative obligations, including reporting any known violations by subcontractors, informing the contracting officer of legal challenges to the clause, and ensuring consistent flow-down of the requirement to all tiers of subcontracting. Contract administration is overseen by PCO Dean Allen, reachable via email, while no COTR or COR is listed. Payment, invoicing methods, and accounting data such as TAS or ACRN identifiers are not specified, nor are FOB terms, formal inspection criteria, or packaging and marking standards explicitly defined, despite the use of NSNs and CAGE codes typically associated with DoD logistics. No evaluation factors, socioeconomic certifications, security clearances, options, or MIL-STDs are referenced in the documentation, leaving the technical and logistical expectations to be inferred from general FAR and DLA compliance norms rather than explicit requirements.