PRODUCTION LOT TESTING (GOVERNMENT)

The Defense Logistics Agency awarded Contract SPEA4726P6742 to YAMA MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED (CAGE 0RVE1) on July 21, 2026, for a total value of $26,994.00 under Solicitation SPE4A7-26-T-5790. The contract encompasses three primary deliverables: Production Lot Testing conducted by the Government, Government First Article Testing, and the supply of a BRACKET, EJECTION SE identified by NSN 1670010684205. Performance is centered at the contractor’s facility in San Antonio, Texas, with no indication of international performance or foreign subcontracting. The contract was issued as a modification (P00001) to an original order dated February 12, 2026, and the award reflects a firm commitment with no stated options, estimated ranges, or CLIN-level pricing details beyond the total amount. The contractor is required to comply with FAR 52.222-90, “Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors,” implemented under DoD Class Deviation 2026-00040, Revision 1, which prohibits racially discriminatory DEI practices and mandates flow-down of this clause to all domestic subcontracts. The contractor must report any known violations by subcontractors, provide access to records for compliance verification, and notify the Contracting Officer of legal challenges to the clause. The Government retains authority to conduct inspection and acceptance through direct testing of production lots and first articles, though specific inspection locations, acceptance criteria, or technical quality standards such as MIL-STD are not detailed in the documentation. Responsibility for delivery and risk of loss is undefined due to the absence of FOB terms, and no explicit delivery schedule, period of performance, or invoicing method is specified. Payment office details, accounting codes (AAC, TAS, ACRN), and the Contracting Officer’s Representative are not provided, though the Contracting Officer is identified as Dean Allen of DLA Aviation in Richmond, Virginia, and the administering office is DCMA South in Madison, Alabama. No attachments, evaluation factors, or socioeconomic certifications are disclosed, and the solicitation does not indicate whether award was based on LPTA or trade-off methodology. The contractor’s unique entity ID is not listed, nor is its size status or socioeconomic designation stated, though its CAGE code is